Khaleel v. Swissport USA Inc.

Filing 5

ORDER DISMISSING CASE: By Order 4 dated September 10, 2015, I dismissed plaintiff's complaint and granted him leave to amend it within thirty (30) days. Plaintiff failed to respond to the Court's Order, and therefore his complaint is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). The Clerk is respectfully directed to enter judgment accordingly. Ordered by Judge John Gleeson on 11/13/2015. (Fallon, Ethan)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
---------------------------------------------------------x
HISHAM A. KHALEEL,

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

ORDER
15-CV-4880 (JG)

Plaintiff,
-againstSWISSPORT USA, INC,
Defendant.
----------------------------------------------------------x
JOHN GLEESON, United States District Judge:
On August 18, 2015, plaintiff Hisham A. Khaleel, proceeding pro se, filed this
action against his former employer, Swissport USA, Inc., alleging that he was terminated in
violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e, et seq. (“Title VII”), the
Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, 29 U.S.C. §§ 621-634 (“ADEA”), and the
Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq.
By Memorandum and Order dated September 10, 2015, I dismissed Khaleel’s
complaint and granted him leave to amend it within thirty (30) days of the date of my Order.
Khaleel was directed that his amended complaint must comply with Rule 8(a) of the Federal Rules
of Civil Procedure by providing all relevant dates and including a short, plain statement of facts
sufficient to support a plausible claim that his former employer discriminated against him in
violation of Title VII, the ADEA, and the ADA. Khaleel was advised that if he failed to file an
amended complaint within thirty (30) days, judgment dismissing the complaint pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) would be entered. Khaleel has failed to respond to my September 10, 2015
Memorandum and Order.

1

Accordingly, it is ordered that the complaint is dismissed without prejudice. 28
U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). The Clerk is respectfully directed to enter judgment accordingly. I
certify pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and
therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of any appeal. Coppedge v. United
States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962).
So ordered.

JOHN GLEESON, U.S.D.J.
Dated: Brooklyn, New York
November 13, 2015

2