Assets Recovery 23, LLC v. Gasper et al
Filing
36
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Having reviewed and considered defendants' objections, I find them meritless, and adopt the Report and its recommendations without limitation or qualification. I ask Magistrate JudgePollak to conduct a hearing on the validity of service as to defendant Marlena Gasper at the Court's convenience and invite further recommendation when appropriate fact-finding is completed. SO Ordered by Judge Raymond J. Dearie on 8/21/2017. (Ramesar, Thameera)
FILED
IN CLERK'S OFFICE
US DISTRICT COURT E.D.N.Y
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
AUG2 12017
*
BROOKLYN OFFICE
ASSETS RECOVERY 23, LLC,
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
Plaintiff,
15 CV 5049(RJD)
(CLP)
- against MARLENA GASPER,KAHLIL GASPER,
et al..
Defendants.
DEARIE, District Judge
Defendants Marlena and Kahlil Gasper timely object to a report and recommendation
issued by Magistrate Judge Pollak on July 25,2017,recommending that their motion to dismiss
be denied in part and that a hearing be held regarding the validity of service as to defendant
Marlena Gasper. See ECF No. 34("R&R"), at 2; ECF No. 35("Obj.").
When a party objects to a magistrate judge's report and recommendation,the Court "must
determine de novo any part of the magistrate judge's disposition that has been properly objected
to" and may "accept, reject, or modify,in whole or in part, the findings and recommendations
made by the magistrate judge." Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3); see also 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(b)(1)(C). In
ruling on the objection, the Court may rely on the magistrate judge's proposed findings and
recommendation to whatever extent it chooses. United States v. Raddatz. 447 U.S. 667,676
(1980).
Having reviewed and considered defendants' objections, I find them meritless, and adopt
the Report and its recommendations without limitation or qualification. I ask Magistrate Judge
Pollak to conduct a hearing on the validity of service as to defendant Marlena Gasper at the
Court's convenience and invite further recommendation when appropriate fact-finding is
completed.
SO ORDERED.
Dated: Brooklyn, New York
August^,2017
s/ RJD
^EARIl
Unit^ States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?