Campbell v. Conserve Accounts Receivable Management
Filing
9
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER: Plaintiff's amended complaint is dismissed with prejudice. Ordered by Judge Ann M. Donnelly on 8/24/2016. (Greene, Donna)
FILED
IN CLERK'S OFFICE
US DISTRICT COURT E.D.N.Y.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
^ AUG 2 ^ 2016
tJt
EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
X
BROOKLYN OFFICE
LEASER CAMPBELL,
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
Plaintiff,
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND
against
ORDER
CONSERVE ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE
16-CV-02072(AMD)(MDG)
MANAGEMENT
Defendant
X
ANN DONNELLY,District Judge.
The pro se plaintiff, Leaser Campbell, filed a complaint on May 2,2016 alleging that
Conserve Accounts Receivable Management violated the Fair Credit Reporting Act("FCRA")
by pulling her consumer credit reports without her permission. The plaintiff was granted in
formapauperis status on May 6, 2016. On June 8, 2016, the Court sua sponte dismissed the
plaintiffs complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 1915(e)(2), finding that the plaintiff had not
adequately pled either of the elements of a claim under section 1681(b) ofthe FCRA. (ECF 6.)
Specifically, the Court found that the plaintiff had not adequately alleged that the defendant had
pulled her credit report for an impermissible purpose, or that the defendant did so with the
requisite state of mind, and dismissed the complaint without prejudice. The Court gave the
plaintiff 30 days to amend her complaint to address these deficiencies, noting that "[i]f the
plaintiff chooses to re-plead, conclusory allegations that the defendant pulled her credit report for
an impermissible purpose, and that its conduct was willful or negligent, will not suffice; rather.
s/Ann M. Donnelly
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?