Trustees of the Pavers and Road Builders District Council Welfare, Pension, Annuity and Apprenticeship, Skill Improvement and Safety Funds et al v. D. Gangi Contracting Corp. et al
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of Magistrate Judge Reyes. Plaintiffs' motion for default judgment against defendant D. Gangi Contracting Corp is granted. ( Ordered by Judge Allyne R. Ross on 8/8/2017 ) *forwarded for jgm. (Guzzi, Roseann)
IN CLERK'S OFFICE
U S DISTRICT COURT E.D.N.Y.
^ AUG 9 - 2017 *
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
TRUSTEES OF THE PAVERS AND ROAD BUILDERS
DISTRICT COUNCIL WELFARE,PENSION, ANNUITY
AND APPRENTICESHIP,SKILL IMPROVEMENT AND
SAFETY FUNDS and THE HIGHWAY,ROAD AND
STREET CONSTRUCTION LABORERS LOCAL UNION
-againstD. GANGI CONTRACTING CORP. and ENDURANCE
AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY
ROSS, United States District Judge:
The court has received the Report and Recommendation on the instant case dated May
12, 2017 from the Honorable Ramon E. Reyes, Jr., United States Magistrate Judge. EOF No. 30.
The deadline for filing objections has passed,s^ id. at 7; Aff. of Service, EOF No. 31, and no
objections have been filed. Accordingly, the court has reviewed the Report and
Recommendation for clear error on the face of the record. See Advisory Comm. Notes to Fed.
R. Civ. P. 72(b); accord Brissett v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating Auth., No. 09CV-874,2011 WL 1930682, at *1 (E.D.N.Y. May 19, 2011). Having reviewed the record, I find
no clear error. I hereby adopt the Report and Recommendation in its entirety as the opinion of
the Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).
Accordingly, plaintiffs' motion for default judgment against defendant D. Gangi
Contracting Corp. is granted. The clerk of court is directed to enter judgment against D. Gangi
Contracting Corp. in the amount of$135,888.48, representing:(1)$91,681.28 in total unpaid
contributions;(2)$6,273.86 in total unpaid dues check-offs and other contributions;
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?