Deokoro v. Graham

Filing 15

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Accordingly the court denies the habeas petition. Ordered by Judge Carol Bagley Amon on 2/11/2019. (Piper, Francine)

Download PDF
FILED IN CLERK'S OFFICE U.S. DISTRICT COURT E.D.N.Y. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ^ FEB 1 1 2019 * EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK X BROOKLYN OFFICE OMO DEOKORO, Petitioner, NOT FOR PUBLICATION ORDER -against- 16-CV-5487(CBA) (LB) HAROLD D. GRAHAM, Respondent. AMON,United States District Judge: The Court has received the Report and Recommendation("R&R")of the Honorable Lois Bloom, United States Magistrate Judge, for the instant habeas action filed by Petitioner Omo Deokoro pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. In an R&R dated November 15, 2017, Magistrate Judge Bloom recommended that this Court deny the petition,the issuance ofa certificate ofappealability, and leave for Petitioner to file his appeal in forma pauneris. (D.E.# 14.) No party has objected to the R&R,and the time for doing so has passed. When deciding whether to adopt an R&R,the Court"may accept,reject, or modify,in whole or in part,the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). To accept those portions ofthe R&R "to which no timely objection has been made,a district court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record." Jarvis v. N. Am. Globex Fund. L.P., 823 F. Supp. 2d 161,163(E.D.N.Y. 2011)(quoting Wilds v. United Parcel Serv.,262 F. Supp. 2d 163,169(S.D.N.Y. 2003)). After reviewing the record, the Court adopts Magistrate Judge Bloom's well-reasoned R&R. Accordingly, the Court DENIES the habeas petition. Because Petitioner has not made a substantial showing ofthe denial ofany constitutional right,the Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253: Lozada v. United States, 107 F.3d 1011, 1017 (2d Cir. 19971. abrogated on other grovmds bv United States v. Perez. 192 F.3d 255,259—60(2d Cir. 1997). 1 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), this Court denies Petitioner leave to file an appeal in forma pauperis. certifying that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. See Coppedge v. United States. 369 U.S. 438,443-45 (1962). SO ORDERED. Dated: February 11, 2019 Brooklyn, New York s/Carol B. Amon Carol United States Dis Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?