Deokoro v. Graham
Filing
15
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Accordingly the court denies the habeas petition. Ordered by Judge Carol Bagley Amon on 2/11/2019. (Piper, Francine)
FILED
IN CLERK'S OFFICE
U.S. DISTRICT COURT E.D.N.Y.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
^ FEB 1 1 2019 *
EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
X
BROOKLYN OFFICE
OMO DEOKORO,
Petitioner,
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
ORDER
-against-
16-CV-5487(CBA)
(LB)
HAROLD D. GRAHAM,
Respondent.
AMON,United States District Judge:
The Court has received the Report and Recommendation("R&R")of the Honorable Lois
Bloom, United States Magistrate Judge, for the instant habeas action filed by Petitioner Omo
Deokoro pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. In an R&R dated November 15, 2017, Magistrate Judge
Bloom recommended that this Court deny the petition,the issuance ofa certificate ofappealability,
and leave for Petitioner to file his appeal in forma pauneris. (D.E.# 14.)
No party has objected to the R&R,and the time for doing so has passed. When deciding
whether to adopt an R&R,the Court"may accept,reject, or modify,in whole or in part,the findings
or recommendations made by the magistrate judge." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). To accept those
portions ofthe R&R "to which no timely objection has been made,a district court need only satisfy
itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record." Jarvis v. N. Am. Globex Fund. L.P.,
823 F. Supp. 2d 161,163(E.D.N.Y. 2011)(quoting Wilds v. United Parcel Serv.,262 F. Supp. 2d
163,169(S.D.N.Y. 2003)).
After reviewing the record, the Court adopts Magistrate Judge Bloom's well-reasoned
R&R. Accordingly, the Court DENIES the habeas petition. Because Petitioner has not made a
substantial showing ofthe denial ofany constitutional right,the Court declines to issue a certificate
of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253: Lozada v. United States, 107 F.3d 1011, 1017 (2d Cir.
19971. abrogated on other grovmds bv United States v. Perez. 192 F.3d 255,259—60(2d Cir. 1997).
1
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), this Court denies Petitioner leave to file an appeal in forma
pauperis. certifying that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. See
Coppedge v. United States. 369 U.S. 438,443-45 (1962).
SO ORDERED.
Dated: February 11, 2019
Brooklyn, New York
s/Carol B. Amon
Carol
United States Dis
Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?