Johnson v. United States of America
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION transferring case to the District of Maryland.. Ordered by Judge Allyne R. Ross on 10/13/2016. (Marziliano, August)
N CLERK'S OFFICE
OlSTRICT COURT E.D.N.Y
' UUI 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
NOT FOR EI.ECTRONIC
OR PRINT PUBLICATION
-againstOPINION & ORDER
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
ROSS, United States District Judge:
James Johnson, who is currently incarcerated at FCI Cumberland in Cumberland,
Maryland, moves the court pro se to restore 724 days of"non-vested good conduct time," which
he lost pursuant to two disciplinary sanctions. Because jurisdiction properly lies in the District
of Maryland, the petition is transferred to that court.
Johnson stylizes his petition as one to modify his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c). A
challenge to a loss of good time credits, however, is properly brought under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 as
a challenge to the execution of a sentence. See Carmona v. U.S. Bureau ofPrisons., 243 F.3d
629,632(2d Cir. 2001). Because petitioner is proceeding pro se, this court will liberally
construe his petition to have been filed under § 2241. See Henry v. United States, No. 11-CV391, 2014 WL 7075800, at *3(E.D.N.Y. Dec. 12, 2014).
Jurisdiction over § 2241 petitions lies in the district of confinement. Falconi v. United
States, No. CV-03-4272, 2004 WL 2297823, at *1 (E.D.N.Y. Oct. 13, 2004)(citing Rumsfeld v.
Padilla, 542 U.S. 426,443 (2004)). Johnson is incarcerated in the District of Maryland.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?