In the Matter of Y.S. and N. S. et al v. Sarhan

Filing 24

SUPPLEMENTAL ORDER RE: PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION: Pursuant to a telephone conference with all parties held on the record this day before the undersigned and Magistrate Judge Steven Gold, and on consent of all parties, the Court hereby ORDERS as follows: This Courts Preliminary Injunction Order at Docket No. 20, a copy of which is attached hereto, does not impede the authority of the New York State Family Court from making determinations of temporary physical custody of the children during the pendency of the Hague Convention proceedings. Ordered by Judge Roslynn R. Mauskopf on 11/3/2016. (Mauskopf, Roslynn)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK In the Matter of Y.S. and N.S., minors under the age of 16, MARIA TERESA BARRERA ACOSTA and HERIBERTO BARRERA, Petitioners, Case No. 16-cv-5817 SUPPLEMENTAL ORDER RE: PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION vs. SAMY MOHAMED SARHAN, Respondent. Pursuant to a telephone conference with all parties held on the record this day before the undersigned and Magistrate Judge Steven Gold, and on consent of all parties, the Court hereby ORDERS as follows: This Court’s Preliminary Injunction Order at Docket No. 20, a copy of which is attached hereto, does not impede the authority of the New York State Family Court from making determinations of temporary physical custody of the children during the pendency of the Hague Convention proceedings. SO ORDERED. Dated: Brooklyn, New York November 3, 2016 Roslynn R. Mauskopf _______________________________ ROSLYNN R. MAUSKOPF United States District Judge Case 1:16-cv-05817-RRM-SMG Document 20 Filed 11/01/16 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 466 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK In the Matter of Y.S. and N.S., minors under the age of 16, MARIA TERESA BARRERA ACOSTA and HERIBERTO BARRERA, Case No. 16-cv-5817 Pltt - -- ~ [P~ PRELIMINARY Petitioners, INJUNCTION vs. SAMY MOHAMED SARHAN, Respondent. Upon the consent of all parties on the record at a Show Cause hearing on October 27, 2016, the parties now jointly submit the following proposed Order to the Court. Without prejudice to any party making an application to this Court during the pendency of this litigation seeking relief or modification of the restraints imposed below, the following PRELIMINARY INJUNCTNE RELIEF IS HEREBY ORDERED: a) Pending a hearing on the merits of the Verified Petition, neither the Petitioners nor the Respondent, or any person acting at the request or direction of the Petitioners or the Respondent shall take any action to remove the Children (defined in the Verified Petition) from the vicinity of New York City; b) The Respondent shall surrender into the custody of this Court any of the Respondent's travel documents (including passports and visas) that are not in the custody of a state or federal government entity, pending a determination on the merits of the Verified Petition; 1 Case 1:16-cv-05817-RRM-SMG Document 20 Filed 11/01/16 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 467 c) The Respondent shall surrender into the custody of this Court any of the Children's travel documents (including passports and visas) that are not in the custody of Petitioners or a state or federal government entity, pending a determination on the merits of the Verified Petition; d) Neither the Petitioners nor the Respondent, or any person acting at the request or direction of the Petitioners or the Respondent shall apply for, renew, and/or otherwise obtain passports, visas and any other immigration and/or travel documents for the Children from the United States, Egypt, Mexico, or any other Country, pending a determination on the merits of the Verified Petition; and e) No court in the State of New York or any other State or territory in the United States shall make a final determination regarding the custody of the Children, pending a determination on the merits of the Verified Petition, as provided by Article 16 of the Hague Convention. SO ORDERED: DATED: Al~. I '2016 s/Roslynn R. Mauskopf The Honorable Roslynn R. Mauskopf United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?