Persaud v. Nameoke 1 LLC et al

Filing 19

MEMORANDUM & ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: On May 8, 2017, Magistrate Judge James Orenstein issued a Report and Recommendation 18 (R&R) recommending that the Court dismiss plaintiffs complaint with prejudice. No objections have been fi led to date, and the opportunity to object has passed. No such error appears here. Accordingly, the Court adopts the Report & Recommendation 18 without de novo review and dismisses plaintiffs complaint with prejudice. Ordered by Judge Frederic Block on 6/28/2017. (Innelli, Michael)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
--------------------------------------------------x
CHRIS PERSAUD,
Plaintiff,
-against-

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
16-cv-6877 (FB) (JO)

NAMEOKE 1 LLC, NAMEOKE
EQUITIES LLC, NAMEOKE HOLDINGS
LLC, NAMEOKE LLC, NAMEOKE
REALTY CO., INC., SUPREME PLUS
GROUP REALTY CORP., DAVID
DECTER, TZUI HARRY FRENKEL,
EDWARD FRIEDMAN, STEVEN
GREENBAUM, MILA LIVSHITZ,
MARK WEISSMAN,
Defendants.
--------------------------------------------------x
Appearances:
For Plaintiff:
MATTHEW PAUL MADZELAN
Slater Slater Schulman LLP
445 Broad Hollow Road, Suite 334
Melville, New York 11747
BLOCK, Senior District Judge:
On May 8, 2017, Magistrate Judge James Orenstein issued a Report and
Recommendation (“R&R”) recommending that the Court dismiss plaintiff’s complaint
with prejudice. No objections have been filed to date, and the opportunity to object has
passed.
Where there are no objections, the Court may adopt the R&R without de novo
review. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149–50 (1985); Mario v. P & C Food Mkts.,

Inc., 313 F.3d 758, 766 (2d Cir. 2002) (“Where parties receive clear notice of the
consequences, failure timely to object to a magistrate’s report and recommendation
operates as a waiver of further judicial review of the magistrate’s decision.”). The Court
must conduct de novo review if it appears that the magistrate judge may have committed
plain error. See Spence v. Superintendent, Great Meadow Corr. Facility, 219 F.3d 162,
174 (2d Cir. 2000). No such error appears here. Accordingly, the Court adopts the
R&R without de novo review and dismisses plaintiff’s complaint with prejudice.
SO ORDERED.
_/S/ Frederic Block_____
FREDERIC BLOCK
Senior United States District Judge
Brooklyn, New York
June 28, 2017

2