Keita v. Federal Government of USA et al
MEMORANDUM & ORDER denying 11 Motion for Reconsideration. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that any appeal would not be taken in good faith, and, therefore, in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of anyappeal. See Coppedge v. United Statesy 369 U.S. 438,444-45, 82 S. Ct. 917, 920-21, 8 L. Ed. 2d 21 (1962). Ordered by Judge Eric N. Vitaliano on 12/2/2017. (Williams, Erica)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
FEDERAL GOVERNMENT OF USA AND NEW
YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
Pro se plaintiff Mohammed Keita's motion,filed November 9,2017, seeks
reconsideration of the Court's October 24,2017 order dismissing the complaint v^th prejudice
and without leave to amend. The motion is denied.
Keita makes no showing ofthe Court's misapprehension offacts or law at the time of its
ruling. The absence ofsuch a showing is fatal to his request that the Court revisit its prior
decision. See Shrader v. CSXTransp., Inc.y 70 F.3d 255,257(2d Cir. 1995).
The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that any appeal would not be
taken in good faith, and,therefore, informa pauperis status is denied for the purpose of any
appeal. See Coppedge v. United Statesy 369 U.S. 438,444-45,82 S. Ct. 917,920-21,8 L. Ed. 2d
The Clerk of Court is directed to maintain this casern the closed dockdf.
Dated: Brooklyn, New York
s/Eric N. Vitaliano
December 2, 2017
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?