Keita v. Federal Government of USA et al

Filing 13

MEMORANDUM & ORDER denying 11 Motion for Reconsideration. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that any appeal would not be taken in good faith, and, therefore, in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of anyappeal. See Coppedge v. United Statesy 369 U.S. 438,444-45, 82 S. Ct. 917, 920-21, 8 L. Ed. 2d 21 (1962). Ordered by Judge Eric N. Vitaliano on 12/2/2017. (Williams, Erica)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

MOHAMMED KEITA,

Plaintiff,
MEMORANDUM & ORDER

-against17-CV-877

FEDERAL GOVERNMENT OF USA AND NEW
YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND

HUMAN SERVICES,
Defendants.
X

VITALIANO,D.J.

Pro se plaintiff Mohammed Keita's motion,filed November 9,2017, seeks
reconsideration of the Court's October 24,2017 order dismissing the complaint v^th prejudice
and without leave to amend. The motion is denied.

Keita makes no showing ofthe Court's misapprehension offacts or law at the time of its

ruling. The absence ofsuch a showing is fatal to his request that the Court revisit its prior
decision. See Shrader v. CSXTransp., Inc.y 70 F.3d 255,257(2d Cir. 1995).

The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that any appeal would not be

taken in good faith, and,therefore, informa pauperis status is denied for the purpose of any

appeal. See Coppedge v. United Statesy 369 U.S. 438,444-45,82 S. Ct. 917,920-21,8 L. Ed. 2d
21 (1962).

The Clerk of Court is directed to maintain this casern the closed dockdf.
So Ordered.

Dated: Brooklyn, New York

s/Eric N. Vitaliano

December 2, 2017

ERK:N. VITALIANO
United States District Judge