Keita et al v. Liberty Mutual Insurance et al

Filing 11

MEMORANDUM & ORDER denying 9 Motion for Reconsideration. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that any appeal would not be taken in good faith, and, therefore, in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of any appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438,444-45, 82 S. Ct. 917, 920-21, 8 L. Ed. 2d 21 (1962). Ordered by Judge Eric N. Vitaliano on 12/4/2017. (Williams, Erica)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

MOHAMMED KEITA,

Plaintiff,

MEMORANDUM &
ORDER

-against17-CV-1695

LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE,CON
EDISON OF NEW YORK,STATE FARM
INSURANCE,NYC COMPTROLLER,AND
NYC PUBLIC ADVOCATE OFFICE,
Defendants.
X

VITALIANO,D.J.

Pro se plaintiff Mohammed Keita's motion, filed November 13,2017, seeks
reconsideration ofthe Court's November 6,2017 order dismissing his complaint without

prejudice for lack ofsubject matter jurisdiction. The motion is denied.
Keita makes no showing of any misapprehension by the Court of facts or law at the time

of its ruling, which would require the Court to revisit its prior decision. See Shrader v. CSX

Transp., Inc.,70 F.3d 255,257(2d Cir. 1995).

j
I

The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that any appeal would not be

taken in good faith, and, therefore, informa pauperis status is denied for the purpose of any

appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438,444-45, 82 S. Ct. 917,920-21,8 L. Ed. 2d
21 (1962).
The Clerk of Court is directed to maintain this case on the closed docket.
So Ordered.

Dated: Brooklyn, New York
December 4, 2017

s/ Eric N. Vitaliano
ERIC N. VITALIANO

United States District Judge