Bey v. Ponte et al
Filing
48
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER dated 9/24/17 that On September 20, 2017, plaintiff filed a motion requesting a settlement conference, to compel discovery, and for summary judgement. Plaintiffs motion is denied as moot as the case has already been c losed and judgment entered. The Court certifies pursuant to 28:19l5(a)(3) that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of any appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438 (1962).( Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 9/24/2017 ) c/m (Guzzi, Roseann)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
--------------------------------------------------------VICKY WARE BEY,
Plaintiff,
- against JOSEPH PONTE; AARON SCARLETT;
NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS; CITY OF NEW YORK;
CYNTHIA BRANN; JOHN DOE 1-1000; and
JANE DOE 1-1000,
Defendants.
---------------------------------------------------------
C/M
X
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
MEMORANDUM
DECISION AND ORDER
17-cv-3476 (BMC)(JO)
X
By Memorandum Decision and Order dated September 13, 2017, I granted defendants’
motion to dismiss, denied the remaining open motions as moot, and directed the Clerk of Court
to terminate the unserved defendants and enter judgment in favor of those who had been served.
Judgment was entered and the unserved defendants were dismissed on September 15, 2017. On
September 20, 2017, plaintiff filed a motion requesting a settlement conference, to compel
discovery, and for summary judgement. Plaintiff’s motion is denied as moot as the case has
already been closed and judgment entered.
The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 19l5(a)(3) that any appeal would not be taken
in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of any appeal. See
Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438 (1962).
SO ORDERED.
Digitally signed by Brian M.
Cogan
______________________________________
U.S.D.J.
Dated: Brooklyn, New York
September 24, 2017
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?