Irving v. Gmach et al

Filing 5

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: By Order dated July 18, 2017, the Court denied Irving's application to proceed in forma pauperis ("IFP"). The Court directedIrving to pay the filing fee of $400 to the Clerk of Court by August 18, 20 17. To date, Irving has failed to pay the filing fee. Accordingly, the action is dismissed without prejudice. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment and close this case. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order and the accompanying judgment to plaintiff pro se Mark Christopher Irving at the address listed on the docket, and note the mailing on the docket. Ordered by Judge Roslynn R. Mauskopf on 10/26/2017. (Taronji, Robert)

UNITED STA TES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

-----------------------------------------------------------)(
MARK CHRISTOPHER IRVING,

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
17-CV-3920 (RRM) (LB)

Plaintiff,
-againstDA YID GMACH, and CONSOLIDATED
EDISON COMPANY OF NEW YORK,
Defendants.

------------------------------------------------------------)(
ROSL YNN R. MAUSKOPF, United States District Judge.
Plaintiff Mark Christopher Irving, appearing pro se, filed this action on June 29, 2017 ,
all eging employment discrimination on accou nt of his race and age under Title VII of the Civil
Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, et seq. ("Title VII"). By Order dated July 18, 2017, the
Court denied Irving' s application to proceed in fo rma pauperis ("IFP"). The Court directed
Irving to pay the filing fee of $400 to the C lerk of Court by August 18, 20 17. To date, Irving has
failed to pay the filin g fee. Accordingly, the action is di smissed without prejudice.
The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § I 915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order
would not be taken in good fa ith and therefore in forma pauper is status is denied for the purpose
of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 ( 1962).
The C lerk of Court is directed to enter judgment and close this case. The Clerk of Court
is directed to mai I a copy of thi s order and the accompanying judgment to plaintiffprose Mark
C hri stopher Irving at the address listed on the docket, and note the mailing on the docket.
SO ORDERED.
Dated: Brooklyn, New York
{)cJ- ()-& , 201 7

R

s/Roslynn R. Mauskopf

United States District Judge