Edo v. Martiny

Filing 4

ORDER DISMISSING CASE: By letter dated July 10, 2017, the Clerk of Court mailed the proper forms to Plaintiff and instructed him that, in order to proceed with this action, he must, within 14 days, (1) either pay the filing fee or return the completed IFP application and (2) return the PLRA form. (Dkt. 2.) Plaintiff failed to respond to the Court's letter. Accordingly, theaction is dismissed without prejudice. Ordered by Judge Pamela K. Chen on 8/29/2017. (Chivers, Jeffrey)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
------------------------------------------------------------------x
ENEKAN EDO,
Plaintiff,

ORDER

-v-

17-CV-4094 (PKC)

DETECTIVE RONALD MARTINY, 113th Precinct,
Defendant.
------------------------------------------------------------------x
PAMELA K. CHEN, United States District Judge:
On July 5, 2017, Plaintiff Enekan Edo, an inmate of Elmira Correctional Facility, filed the
instant pro se action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff failed to include (1) the requisite
filing fee or in forma pauperis application and (2) the Prison Litigation Reform Act (“PLRA”)
form required to commence this action. By letter dated July 10, 2017, the Clerk of Court mailed
the proper forms to Plaintiff and instructed him that, in order to proceed with this action, he must,
within 14 days, (1) either pay the filing fee or return the completed IFP application and (2) return
the PLRA form. (Dkt. 2.) Plaintiff failed to respond to the Court’s letter. Accordingly, the
action is dismissed without prejudice.

SO ORDERED.
/s/ Pamela K. Chen
Pamela K. Chen
United States District Judge
Dated: August 29, 2017
Brooklyn, New York