Vega v. K & C Interior Construction Corp. et al

Filing 14

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: I adopt the Report and Recommendation in its entirety. Accordingly, Vega's motion for default judgment is granted against K & C, and he is awarded $30,968.50 in damages and costs, plus post-judgment interest. Ordered by Judge Allyne R. Ross on 9/13/2018. (Gifford, Alison)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Cristhian Vega, Plaintiff — against — K & C Interior Construction Corp., Kevin Doe, and John Does No. 1-10, 18-cv-182 (ARR) Opinion & Order Not for electronic or print publication Defendants. ROSS, United States District Judge: This Court has received the Report and Recommendation on the instant case dated August 28, 2018, from the Honorable Ramon E. Reyes, Jr., United States Magistrate Judge. No objections have been filed. The Court reviews “de novo any part of the magistrate judge’s disposition that has been properly objected to.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); see also Brissett v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating Auth., No. 09-CV-874 (CBA)(LB), 2011 WL 1930682, at *1 (E.D.N.Y. May 19, 2011). Where no timely objections have been filed, “the district court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record.” Finley v. Trans Union, Experian, Equifax, No. 17-CV-0371 (LDH)(LB), 2017 WL 4838764, at *1 (E.D.N.Y. Oct. 24, 2017) (quoting Estate of Ellington ex rel. Ellington v. Harbrew Imports Ltd., 812 F. Supp. 2d 186, 189 (E.D.N.Y. 2011)). Having reviewed the record, I find no clear error. I therefore adopt the Report and Recommendation, in its entirety, as the opinion of the Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Accordingly, Vega’s motion for default judgment is granted against K & C, and he is awarded $30,968.50 in damages and costs, plus post-judgment interest. SO ORDERED. _______/s/________________ Allyne R. Ross United States District Judge Dated: September 13, 2018 Brooklyn, New York 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?