Pagan v. Pier 76, Inc. et al

Filing 30

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: For the reasons set forth in the attached Order, the Court Orders the following: 1) defendants are to produce the requested contact information by December 13, 2018; 2) the proposed Judicial Notice is approved; 3) the proposed Consent Form is approved; and 4) the procedures set forth by plaintiff are approved. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl L. Pollak on 12/4/2018. (Caggiano, Diana)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -X VICTORIA PAGAN, Plaintiff, -againstMEMORANDUM AND ORDER PIER 76, INC., JOE & PAT'S PIZZERIA, INC., JOE & PAT'S PIZZERIA & RESTAURANT,LLC,PAPPAGUSTO,INC., GENNARO PAPPALARDO, JEREMY 18 CV 1460(KAM) (CLP) PAPPALARDO Defendants. -X POLLAK,United States Magistrate Judge: On March 8, 2018, plaintiff Victoria Pagan commenced this lawsuit individually and on behalf of others similarly situated against Pier 76,Inc., Joe & Pat's Pizzeria, Inc., Joe & Pat's Pizzeria & Restaurant, LLC,Pappagusto, Inc., Gennaro Pappalardo, and Jeremy Pappalardo (collectively,"defendants"), seeking unpaid minimum wages and overtime wages pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act("FLSA"),29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq.. and the New York Labor Law ("NYLL")§ 650 etseq. On November 30,2018, plaintiff filed a request for a pre-motion conference seeking an Order from the Court regarding conditional certification ofthe collective. Plaintiff asserts that she has been attempting to confer with defendants on the language of the proposed Notice and Consent Form and attempted to obtain from defendants the contact information necessary to send the notice to similarly situated employees. (11/30/18 Ltr.' at 1). Despite this Court's specific ' Citations to "11/30/18 Ltr." refer to plaintiffs Request for Pre-Motion Conference Regarding Collective Certification, filed on November 30,2018. 1 direction to the parties at the October 30, 2018 conference, plaintiff contends that defendants have not responded to plaintiffs efforts to confer. (Id.l Accordingly, plaintiff now requests an Order from the Court approving the proposed Judicial Notice and the proposed Consent Form. (Id. at 1-2). Moreover, plaintiff requests that the Court Order defendants to produce contact information for "all hourly(non-management) workers employed by(or working at, if'off the books') either restaurant at any time between 6 years before the filing ofthe complaint and 11/30/2018." (Id at 2). Plaintiff requests the full name, phone number(s), email address(es), mailing address(es), dates of employment, and position(s) of the potential collective members. (Id.) Finally, plaintiff requests that the Court Order a 60-day opt-in period and direct distribution ofthe notice through mail, email, posting at the restaurants, text, and social media in English. Since defendants have not responded to plaintiffs counsel's repeated requests for collaboration(s^ id at 1), the Court Orders the following: 1) defendants are to produce the requested contact information in one week, bv December 13,2018;2)the proposed Judicial Notice is approved; 3)the proposed Consent Form is approved; and 4)the procedures set forth by plaintiff are approved. The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to the parties either electronically through the Electronic Case Filing(ECF)system or by mail. SO ORDERED. Dated: Brooklyn, New York December 4,2018 /s/ Cheryl Pollak • Cheryl L^ollak United ^tes Magistrate Judge Eastem^istrict ofNew York

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?