Pagan v. Pier 76, Inc. et al
Filing
30
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: For the reasons set forth in the attached Order, the Court Orders the following: 1) defendants are to produce the requested contact information by December 13, 2018; 2) the proposed Judicial Notice is approved; 3) the proposed Consent Form is approved; and 4) the procedures set forth by plaintiff are approved. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl L. Pollak on 12/4/2018. (Caggiano, Diana)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
-X
VICTORIA PAGAN,
Plaintiff,
-againstMEMORANDUM AND ORDER
PIER 76, INC., JOE & PAT'S PIZZERIA,
INC., JOE & PAT'S PIZZERIA &
RESTAURANT,LLC,PAPPAGUSTO,INC.,
GENNARO
PAPPALARDO, JEREMY
18 CV 1460(KAM)
(CLP)
PAPPALARDO
Defendants.
-X
POLLAK,United States Magistrate Judge:
On March 8, 2018, plaintiff Victoria Pagan commenced this lawsuit individually and on
behalf of others similarly situated against Pier 76,Inc., Joe & Pat's Pizzeria, Inc., Joe & Pat's
Pizzeria & Restaurant, LLC,Pappagusto, Inc., Gennaro Pappalardo, and Jeremy Pappalardo
(collectively,"defendants"), seeking unpaid minimum wages and overtime wages pursuant to the
Fair Labor Standards Act("FLSA"),29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq.. and the New York Labor Law
("NYLL")§ 650 etseq.
On November 30,2018, plaintiff filed a request for a pre-motion conference seeking an
Order from the Court regarding conditional certification ofthe collective. Plaintiff asserts that she
has been attempting to confer with defendants on the language of the proposed Notice and
Consent Form and attempted to obtain from defendants the contact information necessary to send
the notice to similarly situated employees. (11/30/18 Ltr.' at 1). Despite this Court's specific
' Citations to "11/30/18 Ltr." refer to plaintiffs Request for Pre-Motion Conference
Regarding Collective Certification, filed on November 30,2018.
1
direction to the parties at the October 30, 2018 conference, plaintiff contends that defendants have
not responded to plaintiffs efforts to confer. (Id.l
Accordingly, plaintiff now requests an Order from the Court approving the proposed
Judicial Notice and the proposed Consent Form. (Id. at 1-2). Moreover, plaintiff requests that the
Court Order defendants to produce contact information for "all hourly(non-management) workers
employed by(or working at, if'off the books') either restaurant at any time between 6 years
before the filing ofthe complaint and 11/30/2018." (Id at 2). Plaintiff requests the full name,
phone number(s), email address(es), mailing address(es), dates of employment, and position(s) of
the potential collective members. (Id.) Finally, plaintiff requests that the Court Order a 60-day
opt-in period and direct distribution ofthe notice through mail, email, posting at the restaurants,
text, and social media in English.
Since defendants have not responded to plaintiffs counsel's repeated requests for
collaboration(s^ id at 1), the Court Orders the following: 1) defendants are to produce the
requested contact information in one week, bv December 13,2018;2)the proposed Judicial
Notice is approved; 3)the proposed Consent Form is approved; and 4)the procedures set forth by
plaintiff are approved.
The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to the parties either electronically
through the Electronic Case Filing(ECF)system or by mail.
SO ORDERED.
Dated: Brooklyn, New York
December 4,2018
/s/ Cheryl Pollak
•
Cheryl L^ollak
United ^tes Magistrate Judge
Eastem^istrict ofNew York
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?