Paloma v. Lasership et al

Filing 8

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. The complaint is dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to mail a copy of this order to the pro se plaintiff and close this case. Ordered by Judge Ann M. Donnelly on 1/6/2022. (Greene, Donna)

Download PDF
Case 1:21-cv-06041-AMD-JRC Document 8 Filed 01/07/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 33 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK --------------------------------------------------------------- X : MIRIAHM PALOMA, : Plaintiff, : MEMORANDUM AND ORDER – against – : 21-CV-6041 (AMD)(JRC) LASERSHIP and ISRAEL LUCIANO, : : Defendants. : --------------------------------------------------------------- X ANN M. DONNELLY, United States District Judge: On October 26, 2021, the plaintiff Miriahm Paloma filed this pro se civil action, alleging violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq. She did not submit the filing fee. Her initial application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) was insufficient to establish indigency that would entitle her to proceed without the prepayment of fees, because it did not state the source or amount of her income or provide any information about her assets or monthly expenses. (ECF No. 2.) By Order dated November 9, 2021, the Court directed the plaintiff to pay the filing fee or file a Long Form IFP application to cure this deficiency. (ECF No. 4.) The plaintiff submitted the Long Form application on November 18, 2021, but it was equally deficient. (ECF No. 5.) By Order dated December 5, 2021, the Court denied the plaintiff’s IFP application and directed her to pay the filing fee within 14 days.1 (ECF No. 6.) The plaintiff has not submitted the filing fee within the time allowed. 1 After the Court denied her IPF application, the plaintiff submitted another Long Form application on December 15, 2021. (ECF No. 7.) It provided even less information than her previous applications and was also deficient. Case 1:21-cv-06041-AMD-JRC Document 8 Filed 01/07/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 34 CONCLUSION Accordingly, the complaint is dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to mail a copy of this order to the pro se plaintiff and close this case. SO ORDERED. s/Ann M. Donnelly ___________________________ ANN M. DONNELLY United States District Judge Dated: Brooklyn, New York January 6, 2022 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?