United States of America v. Salten et al

Filing 148

MEMORANDUM & ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; For the foregoing reasons, the Court ADOPTS Judge Lindsay's R&R (Docket Entry 146) in its entirety. The Government's motion (Docket Entry 139) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. T he Court GRANTS the Government's motion to the extent it requests the dismissal of defendants Patricia Salten and John Does #1-10, joinder of Brookhaven Memorial Hospital as a necessary defendant, and entry of a default judgment against defendan ts Margaret Salten and Brookhaven Memorial Hospital. The Government's motion is DENIED to the extent it requests the appointment of a special master to sell the Premises. The United States Marshal Service shall conduct the sale of the Premises. The Government is directed to submit a proposed Judgment of Foreclosure and Sale that conforms to the Court's directives within thirty (30) days of the date of this Memorandum and Order. The Government is also directed to serve a copy of this Memorandum and Order on Defendants and file proof of service on ECF within fourteen (14) days. The Clerk of the Court is directed to TERMINATE Patricia Salten and John Does #1-10 as defendants in this action. The Clerk of the Court is further directed to amend the caption to reflect the addition of Brookhaven Memorial Hospital as a defendant in this action. So Ordered by Judge Joanna Seybert on 3/10/2017. C/ECF (Valle, Christine)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------X UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM & ORDER 03-CV-0578 (JS)(ARL) -against– HOWARD SALTEN, MARGARET SALTEN, and if not living their heirs-at-law, if any, PATRICIA SALTEN, also known as PATRICIA LYNCH, JOHN DOES #1-10, inclusive, such names being fictitious and unknown to Plaintiff, the persons or parties intended being tenants, occupants, persons, corporations, or other legal entities, if any, having or claiming an interest in or lien upon the premises described in the Complaint, Defendants. ----------------------------------------X APPEARANCES For Plaintiff: Mary M. Dickman, Esq. United States Attorneys Office Eastern District of New York 271 Cadman Plaza East Brooklyn, NY 11201 For Defendants Howard Salten: Howard Salten, pro se P.O. Drawer 5066 Southampton, NY 11969 Margaret Salten: No appearance Patricia Salten: No appearance SEYBERT, District Judge: Presently pending before the Court is Magistrate Arlene R. Lindsay’s Report and Recommendation dated February 17, 2017, (the “R&R,” Docket Entry 146). For the following reasons, the Court ADOPTS Judge Lindsay’s R&R in its entirety. BACKGROUND The Court presumes familiarity with the factual and procedural history of this matter, which is set forth in the R&R. Briefly, this is a foreclosure action related to premises located at 215 Little Pond Road, (March “Premises”). Fresh 2015 Order, Southampton, Docket New Entry York 136, (the at 2.) Defendant Patricia Salten (“Patricia”) executed a promissory note and mortgage for Administration, Development. a the Premises United States (Order at 2.) in favor agency now of Farmers known as Home Rural Defendant Howard Salten (“Howard”) and his former spouse, defendant Margaret Salten (“Margaret”), later purchased the Premises from Patricia and assumed the mortgage and underlying promissory note. (Order at 2.) Howard is the only defendant who answered the Complaint in this action. (Order at 2.) On October 25, 2006, the Court granted the Government’s motion for summary judgment against Howard. 98.) On April 19, 2007, judgment was (See Docket Entry entered against all Defendants, even though the Government had only moved against Howard. (Judgment, Docket Entry 102.) Motion practice ensued and on March 26, 2015, the Court granted the Government’s motion to amend the judgment to reflect that it is against Howard only. (See 2 March 2015 Order.) On March 31, 2015, the Clerk of the Court entered an amended judgment against Howard. (Am. J., Docket Entry 137.) On June 3, 2016, the Government filed a motion seeking an Order: (1) dismissing Patricia and John Does #1-10 from this action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2), (2) joining Brookhaven Memorial Hospital (“Brookhaven”) as a necessary defendant, (3) amending all papers, pleadings, and proceedings accordingly, (4) entering a default judgment against Margaret and Brookhaven, and (5) appointing a Master to sell the Premises in one parcel. (Pl.’s Mot., Docket Entry 139.) The Government alleges that it is owed a total of $90,561.54 as of May 25, 2016, with interest continuing to accrue upon both the principal amount and the advances. On (Pl.’s Br., Docket Entry 139-5, at 8.) October 6, 2016, the Court referred Plaintiff’s motion to Judge Lindsay for a report and recommendation. (Referral Order, Docket Entry 144.) issued her R&R. On February 17, 2017, Judge Lindsay Judge Lindsay recommends that the Court dismiss this matter against Patricia and John Does #1-10, add Brookhaven as a necessary party, and enter a default judgment against Margaret and Brookhaven. (R&R at 1-2.) Judge Lindsay also recommends that in light of Howard and Margaret’s joint and several liability pursuant to the promissory note and mortgage, “rather than enter a separate judgment against Margaret [ ], an amended judgment be 3 entered that includes Margaret [ ] and accounts for the additional interest and advances that accrued.” (R&R at 8.) Finally, Judge Lindsay recommends that the Court deny the Government’s request that a special master be appointed and instead direct the United States Marshal Service to sell the Premises. (R&R at 10.) DISCUSSION In reviewing an R&R, a district court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, recommendations made by the magistrate judge.” (1)(C). the findings and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) If no timely objections have been made, the “court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record.” Urena v. New York, 160 F. Supp. 2d 606, 609-10 (S.D.N.Y. 2001) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). Objections were due within fourteen (14) days of service of the R&R. The time for filing objections has expired, and no party has objected. Accordingly, all objections are hereby deemed to have been waived. Upon careful review and consideration, the Court finds Judge Lindsay’s R&R to be comprehensive, well-reasoned, and free of clear error, and it ADOPTS the R&R in its entirety. CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, the Court ADOPTS Judge Lindsay’s R&R (Docket Entry 146) in its entirety. The Government’s motion (Docket Entry 139) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. 4 The Court GRANTS the Government’s motion to the extent it requests the dismissal of defendants Patricia Salten and John Does #1-10, joinder of Brookhaven Memorial Hospital as a necessary defendant, and entry of a default judgment against defendants Margaret Salten and Brookhaven Memorial Hospital. The Government’s motion is DENIED to the extent it requests the appointment of a special master to sell the Premises. The United States Marshal Service shall conduct the sale of the Premises. The Government is directed to submit a proposed Judgment of Foreclosure and Sale that conforms to the Court’s directives within thirty (30) days of the date of this Memorandum and Order. The Government is also directed to serve a copy of this Memorandum and Order on Defendants and file proof of service on ECF within fourteen (14) days. The Clerk of the Court is directed to TERMINATE Patricia Salten and John Does #1-10 as defendants in this action. The Clerk of the Court is further directed to amend the caption to reflect the addition of Brookhaven Memorial Hospital as a defendant in this action. SO ORDERED. /s/ JOANNA SEYBERT______ Joanna Seybert, U.S.D.J. Dated: March 10 , 2017 Central Islip, New York 5

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?