Rates Technology Inc. v. Google Inc.

Filing 13

SCHEDULING ORDER: The initial conference previously set for March 17, 2006 at 9:30 a.m. before the undersigned has been rescheduled for April 17, 2006 at 11:00 a.m. at the Alfonse M. D'Amato U.S. Courthouse, Courtroom 830, Central Islip, New York. All counsel shall be present. SEE order for further details.Ordered by Judge E. Thomas Boyle on 3/3/06. Plaintiff's counsel is directed to serve a copy of this order on all parties upon receipt.(Joy, Dolores)

Download PDF
Rates Technology Inc. v. Google Inc. Doc. 13 Case 2:05-cv-04703-ADS-ETB Document 13 Filed 03/03/2006 Page 1 of 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK --------------------------------------------------------------------------X RATES TECHNOLOGY INC., Plaintiff(s), -againstGOOGLE INC., Defendant(s). --------------------------------------------------------------------------X ORDER CV 05-4703 (ADS) (ETB) The initial conference previously set for March 17, 2006 at 9:30 a.m. before the undersigned has been rescheduled for April 17, 2006 at 11:00 a.m. at the Alfonse M. D'Amato U.S. Courthouse, Courtroom 830, Central Islip, New York. All counsel shall be present. No request for adjournment will be considered unless made at least forty-eight (48) hours before the scheduled conference. All requests should be in writing, on consent of all parties, and contain at least two (2) adjourned dates on which all parties are available. In the absence of consent, an explanation of counsel's efforts to obtain agreement should be stated. All requests for adjournments should be addressed to chambers on notice to all parties. Plaintiff's counsel is directed to serve a copy of this Order on counsel for all parties appearing in this case. SO ORDERED: Dated: Central Islip, New York March 3, 2006 /s/ E. Thomas Boyle E. THOMAS BOYLE United States Magistrate Judge Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?