Rates Technology Inc. v. Google Inc.

Filing 5

ORDER denying 4 Motion for Leave to Appear pro hac vice. Under Local Civil Rule 1.3(c), a court certificate, issued by the court within thirty (30) days, is required. A certificate issued by the state bar association is not sufficient. Moreover, the certificate is dated August 11, 2005. For these reasons, the pro hac vice application on behalf of James B. Hicks does not comply and is denied, without prejudice to renewal. Ordered by JudgeE. Thomas Boyle on 10/27/05. (Joy, Dolores)

Download PDF
Rates Technology Inc. v. Google Inc. Doc. 5 Case 2:05-cv-04703-ADS-ETB Document 5 Filed 10/27/2005 Page 1 of 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK --------------------------------------------------------------------------X RATES TECHNOLOGY INC., Plaintiff(s), ORDER -againstGOOGLE INC., Defendant(s). --------------------------------------------------------------------------X Under Local Civil Rule 1.3(c), a court certificate, issued by the court within thirty (30) days, is required. A certificate issued by the state bar association is not sufficient. Moreover, the certificate is dated August 11, 2005. For these reasons, the pro hac vice application on behalf of James B. Hicks does not comply and is denied, without prejudice to renewal. CV 05-4703 (ADS) (ETB) SO ORDERED: Dated: Central Islip, New York October 27, 2005 /s/ E. Thomas Boyle E. THOMAS BOYLE United States Magistrate Judge Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?