First Data Merchant Services Corporation v. Oxford Management Services, Inc.

Filing 55

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re: 54 : Pursuant to the attached Order to Show Cause, the Court hereby ORDERS Oxford to Show Cause in writing, by April 9, 2012 by letter filed electronically with this Court and served on counsel for plaintiff, whether it inte nds to pursue its counterclaims or otherwise defend this action. Failure to so do will result in this Court entering default judgment against defendant Oxford in favor of plaintiff FDMS on plaintiffs claims on which this Court has already granted su mmary judgment pursuant to Rule 55 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCivP), and dismissing all of defendant Oxfords counterclaims pled herein for failure to prosecute pursuant to this Courts authority under FRCivP 16. This Court FURTHER ORDE RS that plaintiff FDMS serve a copy of this Order to Show Cause on defendant Oxford by April 3, 2012 in any manner specified in FRCivP 4, and immediately thereafter electronically file proof of such service with the Court. Ordered by Judge Roslynn R. Mauskopf on 3/30/2012. (Mauskopf, Roslynn)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------X FIRST DATA MERCHANT SERVICES CORPORATION, Plaintiff, - against - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 07-CV-2083 (RRM)(ETB) OXFORD MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC., Defendant. -----------------------------------------------------------X MAUSKOPF, United States District Judge: Plaintiff First Data Merchant Services Corp. (“FDMS” or “Plaintiff”) brought this action against Oxford Management Services, Inc. (“Oxford” or “Defendant”), seeking damages for Defendant’s alleged breach of contract. Plaintiff’s moved for summary judgment, and by Memorandum and Order (Doc. No. 44), granted summary judgment in favor of plaintiff. The Court denied the award of damages without prejudice to renew, following a conference with the Court and the submission of sufficient evidence to support plaintiff’s damage request. Shortly after the Court’s grant of summary judgment, Oxford’s counsel sought, and was granted permission, to withdraw. (See Doc. Nos. 46, 53.) The Court directed Oxford to retain new counsel by July 8, 2011. 1 To date, no counsel has entered a notice of appearance, and as a corporate entity, Oxford may not represent itself. In its Answer (Doc. No. 4), Oxford alleged various counterclaims which remain pending. Plaintiff now seeks an Order declaring Oxford in default, dismissing its counterclaims for failure to prosecute, and allowing plaintiff to renew its request for damages and the entry of judgment upon submission of additional evidence. (Doc. No. 54.) 1 Pursuant to the letter seeking to withdraw, Oxford’s counsel indicated that Oxford had ceased operations on March 17, 2011. (Doc No. 46.) 1 Based on its conduct, particularly, its failure to secure counsel and its lack of diligence in pursuing its counterclaims, Oxford appears to have abandoned this action and has failed diligently to prosecute its counterclaims. In an abundance of caution, the Court hereby ORDERS Oxford to Show Cause in writing, by April 9, 2012 by letter filed electronically with this Court and served on counsel for plaintiff, whether it intends to pursue its counterclaims or otherwise defend this action. Failure to so do will result in this Court entering default judgment against defendant Oxford in favor of plaintiff FDMS on plaintiff’s claims on which this Court has already granted summary judgment pursuant to Rule 55 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“FRCivP”), and dismissing all of defendant Oxford’s counterclaims pled herein for failure to prosecute pursuant to this Court’s authority under FRCivP 16. This Court FURTHER ORDERS that plaintiff FDMS serve a copy of this Order to Show Cause on defendant Oxford by April 3, 2012 in any manner specified in FRCivP 4, and immediately thereafter electronically file proof of such service with the Court. SO ORDERED. Roslynn R. Mauskopf Dated: Brooklyn, New York March 30, 2011 ____________________________________ ROSLYNN R. MAUSKOPF United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?