United States of America v. Mammolito et al
Filing
32
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION granting 21 Motion for Default Judgment; adopting 31 Report and Recommendations. Judge Boyle's R&R is ADOPTED in its entirety, and accordingly, Plaintiff's motion for a default judgment is GRANTED. Plaintiff is awarded a default judgment in the amount of $1,274,167.94, with additional interest to be calculated at a rate of $161.62 per day from January 4, 2012 through the date of judgment. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter a Judgment consistent with this Order and mark this matter CLOSED. So Ordered by Judge Joanna Seybert on 2/22/12. C/ECF (Valle, Christine)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
---------------------------------------X
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
09-CV-3564(JS)(ETB)
-againstTHOMAS MAMMOLITO, THOMAS AUTOMOTIVE,
LLC, and THOMAS DODGE CORP. OF NEW
YORK n/k/a THOMAS SUBARU CORP.,
Defendants.
---------------------------------------X
APPEARANCES
For Plaintiff:
Mary M. Dickman, Esq.
Beth Patricia Schwartz, Esq.
William B. Young, Esq.
United States Attorney’s Office
Eastern District of New York
271 Cadman Plaza East
Brooklyn, NY 11201
For Defendants:
Steven Blatt, Esq.
Bellavia Gentile & Associates, LLP
200 Old Country Road, Suite 400
Mineola, NY 11501
SEYBERT, District Judge:
Pending before the Court is Magistrate Judge E. Thomas
Boyle’s Report and Recommendation (“R&R”), issued on January 4,
2012.
For the reasons that follow, the Court ADOPTS this R&R in
its entirety.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff
United
States
of
America
(“Plaintiff”)
commenced this action on behalf of its agency Small Business
Administration
on
August
19,
2009
against
Defendants
Thomas
Mammolito, Thomas Automotive, LLC, and Thomas Dodge Corp. of New
York seeking to recover the amount allegedly due and owing under
a promissory note.
Defendants
parties
answered
proceeded
Defendants
(Docket Entry 1.)
filed
the
with
a
Complaint.
discovery
stipulation
On October 26, 2009,
(Docket
until
May
withdrawing
Entry
19,
their
2.)
The
2011,
when
Answer
and
waiving any rights to file a motion to dismiss or a new Answer.
(Docket Entry 17.)
on May 23, 2011.
moved
for
The stipulation was so ordered by the Court
(Docket Entry 19.)
entry
of
(Docket Entry 21.)
noted
Defendants’
a
default
On May 24, 2011, Plaintiff
judgment
against
Defendants.
On May 25, 2011, the Clerk of the Court
default.
On
August
5,
2011,
the
Court
referred Plaintiff’s motion to Judge Boyle.
On
recommending
Plaintiff
be
January
4,
that
default
a
awarded
2012,
Judge
judgment
damages
in
Boyle
be
the
issued
granted
amount
an
and
of:
R&R
that
(i)
$1,059,833.97 in unpaid principal on the promissory note; (ii)
$214,333.97 in interest; and (iii) additional interest in the
amount of $161.62 for each day between January 4, 2012 and the
date of judgment.
No party has objected to any portion of Judge Boyle’s
R&R.
2
DISCUSSION
In reviewing an R&R, a district court “may accept,
reject,
or
modify,
recommendations
made
§ 636(b)(1)(C).
in
whole
by
the
or
in
part,
magistrate
the
findings
judge.”
28
and
U.S.C.
If no timely objections have been made, the
“court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on
the face of the record.”
606,
609-10
(S.D.N.Y.
Urena v. New York, 160 F. Supp. 2d
2001)
(internal
quotation
marks
and
citation omitted).
Here, no party objected to Judge Boyle’s R&R.
And the
Court finds his R&R to be correct, comprehensive, well-reasoned
and free of any clear error.
Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS it
in its entirety.
CONCLUSION
Judge
accordingly,
GRANTED.
Boyle’s
Plaintiff’s
R&R
is
motion
ADOPTED
for
a
in
its
default
entirety,
judgment
and
is
Plaintiff is awarded a default judgment in the amount
of $1,274,167.94, with additional interest to be calculated at a
rate of $161.62 per day from January 4, 2012 through the date of
judgment.
The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter a Judgment
consistent with this Order and mark this matter CLOSED.
3
SO ORDERED.
/s/ JOANNA SEYBERT______
Joanna Seybert, U.S.D.J.
Dated:
February 22 , 2012
Central Islip, NY
4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?