United States of America v. Mammolito et al

Filing 32

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION granting 21 Motion for Default Judgment; adopting 31 Report and Recommendations. Judge Boyle's R&R is ADOPTED in its entirety, and accordingly, Plaintiff's motion for a default judgment is GRANTED. Plaintiff is awarded a default judgment in the amount of $1,274,167.94, with additional interest to be calculated at a rate of $161.62 per day from January 4, 2012 through the date of judgment. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter a Judgment consistent with this Order and mark this matter CLOSED. So Ordered by Judge Joanna Seybert on 2/22/12. C/ECF (Valle, Christine)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------X UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM & ORDER 09-CV-3564(JS)(ETB) -againstTHOMAS MAMMOLITO, THOMAS AUTOMOTIVE, LLC, and THOMAS DODGE CORP. OF NEW YORK n/k/a THOMAS SUBARU CORP., Defendants. ---------------------------------------X APPEARANCES For Plaintiff: Mary M. Dickman, Esq. Beth Patricia Schwartz, Esq. William B. Young, Esq. United States Attorney’s Office Eastern District of New York 271 Cadman Plaza East Brooklyn, NY 11201 For Defendants: Steven Blatt, Esq. Bellavia Gentile & Associates, LLP 200 Old Country Road, Suite 400 Mineola, NY 11501 SEYBERT, District Judge: Pending before the Court is Magistrate Judge E. Thomas Boyle’s Report and Recommendation (“R&R”), issued on January 4, 2012. For the reasons that follow, the Court ADOPTS this R&R in its entirety. BACKGROUND Plaintiff United States of America (“Plaintiff”) commenced this action on behalf of its agency Small Business Administration on August 19, 2009 against Defendants Thomas Mammolito, Thomas Automotive, LLC, and Thomas Dodge Corp. of New York seeking to recover the amount allegedly due and owing under a promissory note. Defendants parties answered proceeded Defendants (Docket Entry 1.) filed the with a Complaint. discovery stipulation On October 26, 2009, (Docket until May withdrawing Entry 19, their 2.) The 2011, when Answer and waiving any rights to file a motion to dismiss or a new Answer. (Docket Entry 17.) on May 23, 2011. moved for The stipulation was so ordered by the Court (Docket Entry 19.) entry of (Docket Entry 21.) noted Defendants’ a default On May 24, 2011, Plaintiff judgment against Defendants. On May 25, 2011, the Clerk of the Court default. On August 5, 2011, the Court referred Plaintiff’s motion to Judge Boyle. On recommending Plaintiff be January 4, that default a awarded 2012, Judge judgment damages in Boyle be the issued granted amount an and of: R&R that (i) $1,059,833.97 in unpaid principal on the promissory note; (ii) $214,333.97 in interest; and (iii) additional interest in the amount of $161.62 for each day between January 4, 2012 and the date of judgment. No party has objected to any portion of Judge Boyle’s R&R. 2 DISCUSSION In reviewing an R&R, a district court “may accept, reject, or modify, recommendations made § 636(b)(1)(C). in whole by the or in part, magistrate the findings judge.” 28 and U.S.C. If no timely objections have been made, the “court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record.” 606, 609-10 (S.D.N.Y. Urena v. New York, 160 F. Supp. 2d 2001) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). Here, no party objected to Judge Boyle’s R&R. And the Court finds his R&R to be correct, comprehensive, well-reasoned and free of any clear error. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS it in its entirety. CONCLUSION Judge accordingly, GRANTED. Boyle’s Plaintiff’s R&R is motion ADOPTED for a in its default entirety, judgment and is Plaintiff is awarded a default judgment in the amount of $1,274,167.94, with additional interest to be calculated at a rate of $161.62 per day from January 4, 2012 through the date of judgment. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter a Judgment consistent with this Order and mark this matter CLOSED. 3 SO ORDERED. /s/ JOANNA SEYBERT______ Joanna Seybert, U.S.D.J. Dated: February 22 , 2012 Central Islip, NY 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?