Eng v. Cash et al

Filing 22

ORDER ADOPTING 20 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS and granting 17 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. SO ORDERED that the Court acceptsMagistrate Judge Wall's Report in its entirety. Defts' motion to dismiss the amended complai nt pursuant to Rules 12(b)(l) and (6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is granted and the amended complaint is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice. The Clerk of the Court shall close this case and serve notice of entry of this Order in ac cordance with Rule 77(d)(l) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, including mailing a copy of the Order to the prose plaintiff at her last known address. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of any appeal. CM to pro se plaintiff. Ordered by Judge Sandra J. Feuerstein on 3/26/2012. (Florio, Lisa)

Download PDF
f\LED IN CLERl<'S OFFICE N y U S OISTRICi COURT E 0 * UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ___________________________X t'.~K 2 6 ?.012 * LONG 1: •t\ND OFFICE LILY ENG, Plaintiff, ORDER CV-10-3117(SJF)(WDW) -againstRICK CASH, CHRISTINA BIRNER and MARGARET MILIDANTRI, Defendants. ~~~==~--------------------X FEUERSTEIN, J. Pending before the Court is the Report and Recommendation ("the Report") of Magistrate Judge William D. Wall, dated March 8, 2012, recommending that defendants' motion to dismiss the amended complaint pursuant to Rules l2(b)(l) and l2(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure be granted and that plaintiff's amended complaint be dismissed in its entirety for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. No objections have been filed to the Report. For the reasons stated herein, the Court accepts Magistrate Judge Wall's Report in its entirety. Any portion of a report and recommendation on dispositive matters, to which a timely objection has been made, is reviewed de novo. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l); Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). The court, however, is not required to review the factual findings or legal conclusions of the magistrate judge as to which no proper objections are interposed. See, Thomas v. Am, 474 U.S. 140, 150, 106 S.Ct. 466, 88 L.Ed.2d 435 (1985). To accept the report and recommendation of a magistrate judge on a dispositive matter, to which no timely objection has been made, the district judge need only be satisfied that there is no clear error on the face of the record. See, Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); I ' Johnson v. Goord, 487 F.Supp.2d 377,379 (S.D.N.Y. 2007), affd, 305 Fed. Appx. 815 (2d Cir. Jan. I, 2009); Baptichon v. Nevada State Bank, 304 F.Supp.2d 451,453 (E.D.N.Y. 2004), affd, 125 Fed.Appx. 374 (2d Cir. 2005). Whether or not proper objections have been filed, the district judge may, after review, accept, reject, or modify any of the magistrate judge's findings or recommendations. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l); Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). II No party has filed any objections to Magistrate Judge Wall's Report. Upon review, the Court is satisfied that the Report is not facially erroneous. Accordingly, the Court accepts Magistrate Judge Wall's Report in its entirety. Defendants' motion to dismiss the amended complaint pursuant to Rules 12(b)(l) and (6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is granted and the amended complaint is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice. The Clerk of the Court shall close this case and serve notice of entry ofthis Order in accordance with Rule 77(d)(l) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, including mailing a copy of the Order to the prose plaintiff at her last known address, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(b)(2)(C). The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of any appeal. See Copoedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45, 82 S. Ct. 917, 8 L. Ed.2d 21 (1962). SO ORDERED. s/ Sandra J. Feuerstein SANDRA J. FEUERSTEIN United States District Judge Dated: March 26, 2012 Central Islip, New York 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?