Mack Financial Services et al v. All Island Truck Leasing Corp., et al
Filing
29
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION granting 11 Motion for Entry of Default; adopting in part 27 Report and Recommendation. The Court adopts all portions of the R&R except the discussion of prejudgment interest and orders that a default judgment be entered against Defendants. Plaintiffs are awarded (1) $721,370.97 in principal; (2) $1,272.62 in attorneys' fees; (3) $599.19 in costs; and (4) $360.69 per day in prejudgment interest from February 1, 2011 through the date of judgment. The Clerk of the Court is directed to mark this case CLOSED. So Ordered by Judge Joanna Seybert on 9/30/2011. C/ECF (Valle, Christine)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
---------------------------------------X
MACK FINANICAL SERVICES, a division
Of VFS US LLC, f/k/a Mack Commercial
Finance, VOLVO FINANCIAL SERVICES, a
Division of VFS US LLC, f/k/a Volvo
Commercial Finance,
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
10-CV-3799(JS)(ETB)
Plaintiffs,
-againstFRANK POCZATEK and ROBERT POCZATEK,
Defendants.
---------------------------------------X
APPEARANCES:
For Plaintiffs:
Christopher B. Block, Esq.
Joshua S. Hurwit, Esq.
Gordon & Rees LLP
90 Broad St.
New York, NY 10005
For Defendants:
No Appearances.
SEYBERT, District Judge:
Plaintiffs Mack Financial Services and Volvo Financial
Services
Poczatek
(“Plaintiffs”)
(“Defendants”)
sued
for
Defendants
breach
of
Frank
and
guaranty.
Robert
Defendants
defaulted, and Plaintiffs moved for a default judgment.
On
August 30, 2011, Magistrate Judge A. Kathleen Tomlinson issued a
Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) recommending that Plaintiffs
be awarded $776,604.47 in damages, costs, and attorneys’ fees.
No objections were filed within the prescribed time.
exception,
the
Court
agrees
with
Judge
With one
Tomlinson’s
recommendations.
The R&R awarded prejudgment interest at 18% because,
for
large
commercial
loans,
North
Carolina
law
honors
interest rate to which the parties to the loan agreed.
the
The R&R
calculated prejudgment at 18% over a 365-day year for an amount
of
$355.74
between
accruing
February
1,
in
interest
2011
each
(the
date
judgment motion) and July 1, 2011.
day
of
for
the
Plaintiffs’
(R&R 11.)
150
days
default
In this case, the
parties had actually agreed to 18% percent interest computed on
the basis of a 360-day year (see Docket Entry 24 at 2), which
results in an amount of $360.69 accruing in interest each day.
Additionally, the Court concludes that, rather than cutting off
at July 1, 2011, prejudgment interest should accrue each day
between February 1, 2011 and the date of judgment.
The remainder of the R&R is thorough, well-reasoned,
and free from clear error.
portions
of
the
R&R
Accordingly, the Court adopts all
except
the
discussion
of
prejudgment
interest and orders that a default judgment be entered against
Defendants.
principal;
Plaintiffs
(2)
$1,272.62
are
in
awarded
attorneys’
(1)
fees;
$721,370.97
in
(3)
in
$599.19
costs; and (4) $360.69 per day in prejudgment interest from
February 1, 2011 through the date of judgment.
The Clerk of the Court is directed to mark this case
CLOSED.
2
SO ORDERED.
/s/ JOANNA SEYBERT______
Joanna Seybert, U.S.D.J.
Dated:
September
30 , 2011
Central Islip, New York
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?