Torrey-O'Neal v. Ford Motor Company et al
Filing
6
ORDER granting #3 Motion to Remand to State Court. Based on the foregoing, Plaintiff's motion to remand (Docket Entry 3) is GRANTED and this action shall be remanded to New York State Supreme Court, Nassau County. The Clerk of the Court is directed to mark this matter CLOSED. So Ordered by Judge Joanna Seybert on 7/20/11. C/ECF (Valle, Christine)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
-----------------------------------X
JANICE TORREY-O’NEAL,
Plaintiff,
ORDER
11-CV-1527(JS)(ARL)
-againstCARDONE INDUSTRIES USA, AMERICAN
INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC., and
FORD MOTOR CO.,
Defendants.
------------------------------------X
APPEARANCES:
For Plaintiff:
Bernard A. Nathan, Esq.
Bernard A. Nathan, P.C.
P.O. Box 443
West Islip, NY 11795
For Defendants:
Ford Motor Co.
Cardone Industries
and AIG:
Peter Joseph Fazio, Esq.
Aaronson, Rappaport, Feinstein & Deutsch
600 Third Avenue
New York, NY 10016
No appearances.
SEYBERT, District Judge:
Plaintiff
Cardone
Industries,
Janice
Ford
Torrey-O’Neal
Motor
Company
(“Plaintiff”)
(“Ford”)
and
sued
American
International Group (“AIG”) in New York State Supreme Court,
Nassau County for damages arising out of an automobile accident.
Ford removed the case to this Court; pending before the Court is
Plaintiff’s
motion
to
remand
the
case
back
to
state
court.
Plaintiff, a New Yorker, points out that AIG’s headquarters is
in
Manhattan
and
argues
that
this
case
lacks
the
complete
diversity of citizenship required for federal jurisdiction.
28 U.S.C. § 1332.
See
Ford, the only Defendant to have appeared in
this case, does not oppose the motion.
(See Docket Entry 5.)
The Court agrees that this case should be returned to
state court.
A corporation’s principal place of business is
typically its headquarters, thus AIG should be considered a New
York citizen for purposes of the diversity analysis.
See Hertz
Corp. v. Friend, __ U.S. __, 130 S. Ct. 1181, 1192, 175 L. Ed.
2d 1029 (2010).
Inasmuch as both Plaintiff and AIG are New
Yorkers, complete diversity is lacking and the action should be
remanded.
Based on the foregoing, Plaintiff’s motion to remand
(Docket Entry 3) is GRANTED and this action shall be remanded to
New York State Supreme Court, Nassau County.
The Clerk of the
Court is directed to mark this matter CLOSED.
SO ORDERED.
/s/ JOANNA SEYBERT______
Joanna Seybert, U.S.D.J.
Dated:
July 20 , 2011
Central Islip, New York
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?