Board of Trustees of the Leather Goods Plastics Handbags and Novelty Workers Union, Local 1 Joint Retirement Fund v. Stein Fish Co, Inc.

Filing 17

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - Judge Wall's R&R is ADOPTED in its entirety. Plaintiff is awarded a default judgment and damages in the following amounts: (1) $22,587.00 in withdrawal liability; (2) $598.81 in interest; (3) $2,660.00 in attorneys' fees; and (4) $394.50 in costs. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter a Judgment consistent with this Memorandum and Order and to mark this matter CLOSED. So Ordered by Judge Joanna Seybert on 6/12/2012. C/ECF (Valle, Christine)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------X BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LEATHER GOODS PLASTICS HANDBAGS AND NOVELTY WORKERS UNION, LOCAL 1 JOINT RETIREMENT FUND, MEMORANDUM & ORDER 11-CV-1784(JS)(WDW) Plaintiff, -againstSTEIN FISH CO., INC., Defendant. ---------------------------------------X APPEARANCES For Plaintiff: Jonathan R. Friedman, Esq. UFCW Local 342 166 E. Jericho Turnpike Mineola, NY 11501 For Defendant: No appearances. SEYBERT, District Judge: Pending before the Court is Magistrate Judge William W. Wall’s Report and Recommendation (“R&R”), issued on April 12, 2012. For the following reasons, the Court ADOPTS this R&R in its entirety. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Plastic, Handbags Board and of Trustees Novelty Workers of the Union, Leather Local 1 Goods, Joint Retirement Fund (“Plaintiff”) commenced this action on April 12, 2011 seeking payment of withdrawal liability, accrued interest, attorneys’ fees, and costs pursuant to Sections 502 and 4201 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1132, 1381. Defendant did not answer the Complaint or otherwise appear in the action. Plaintiff moved for an entry of default on July 25, 2011 (Docket Entry 3), which was entered by the Clerk of the Court on July 26, 2011 (Docket Entry 5). On November 1, 2011, Plaintiff moved for default judgment and an award of damages (Docket Entries 6-7), and on November 2, 2011, the Court referred Plaintiff’s motion to Judge Wall (Docket Entry 8). Judge R&R on April 12, 2012 judgment be granted and that Plaintiff be awarded $26,240.31, broken down as follows: (1) recommending Wall that issued a default an $22,587.00 in withdrawal liability, (2) $598.81 in interest, (3) $2,660.00 in attorneys’ fees, and (4) $394.50 in costs. No party has objected to any portion of Judge Wall’s R&R. DISCUSSION In reviewing an R&R, a district court “may accept, reject, or modify, in recommendations made 636(b)(1)(C). If whole by no the timely or in part, magistrate objections the judge.” have findings 28 been and U.S.C. made, § the “court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record.” 606, 609-10 (S.D.N.Y. Urena v. New York, 160 F. Supp. 2d 2001) (internal citation omitted). 2 quotation marks and Here, no party objected to Judge Wall’s R&R. And the Court finds his R&R to be correct, comprehensive, well-reasoned and free of any clear error. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS it in its entirety. CONCLUSION Judge Plaintiff is Wall’s awarded a R&R is default ADOPTED in judgment and its entirety. damages in the following amounts: (1) $22,587.00 in withdrawal liability; (2) $598.81 in interest; (3) $2,660.00 in attorneys’ fees; and (4) $394.50 in costs. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter a Judgment consistent with this Memorandum and Order and to mark this matter CLOSED. SO ORDERED. /s/ JOANNA SEYBERT___________ Joanna Seybert, U.S.D.J. Dated: June 12, 2012 Central Islip, NY 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?