CellMark Paper, Inc. v. New Media Printing et al

Filing 8

ORDER re Referred Motion: See attached order for details. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Arlene R. Lindsay on 8/25/2011. c/ecf (Johnston, Linda)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -----------------------------------------------------------------------X CELLMARK PAPER, INC., Plaintiff, ORDER CV 11-2178 (DRH)(ARL) -againstNEW MEDIA PRINTING, et al., Defendants. ------------------------------------------------------------------X LINDSAY, Magistrate Judge: The matter having been referred to the undersigned by District Judge Hurley for the purpose of issuing a report and recommendation with respect to the entry damages, plaintiff is directed to serve and file papers in support of its damages claim by October 14, 2011. Those papers shall include a memorandum of law and an affidavit from a person with knowledge of the relevant facts. Defendant may submit papers opposing the damages claims by October 28, 2011. If plaintiff believes that the papers submitted in support of the motion for a default judgment suffice for the purposes of the damages inquest, plaintiff shall so inform the court and the defendant in writing. Counsel for plaintiff shall serve a copy of this order on defendant by certified mail, return receipt requested, at its last-known addresses. They shall also serve a copy of the plaintiff’s damages papers on defendant by certified mail, return receipt requested, and shall file, along with its supporting papers, proof of service of: 1) its supporting papers and 2) this order. Defendant shall serve its opposition papers on counsel for plaintiff and shall file opposition papers with proof of service with the Court. Dated: Central Islip, New York August 25, 2011 SO ORDERED: ____________/s/____________ ARLENE ROSARIO LINDSAY United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?