Callari v. Blackman Plumbing Supply, Inc. et al

Filing 209

ADOPTION ORDER re 197 Motion for Attorney Fees; 207 Report and Recommendations. The R&R is adopted in its entirety. The Court awards the Plaintiffs attorney's fees in the sum of $168.032.70 and costs in the sum of $10,860.57. Pu rsuant to the Court's ruling at the November 9, 2018 hearing finding that the of the settlement complies with Cheeks, the Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to close the case. SEE ATTACHED ORDER for details. So Ordered by Judge Arthur D. Spatt on 5/28/2020. (Coleman, Laurie)

Case 2:11-cv-03655-ADS-AKT Document 209 Filed 05/28/20 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 4335

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
--------------------------------------------------------X
MICHAEL CALLARI, individually and on
behalf of other persons similarly situated who
were employed by BLACKMAN PLUMBING
SUPPY, INC., and/or any other entities affiliated
with or controlled by BLACKMAN PLUMBING
SUPPY, INC.,
-against-

FILED 
CLERK 

11:48 am, May 28, 2020

U.S. DISTRICT COURT 
EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 
LONG ISLAND OFFICE 

ADOPTION ORDER
2:11-cv-3655 (ADS) (AKT)

Plaintiffs,

BLACKMAN PLUMBING SUPPLY, INC.,
ROBERT MANNHEIMER, AS
CO-EXECUTOROF THE ESTATE OF
RICHARD BLACKMAN, AND ROBERT A.
TEPEDINO, AS CO-EXECUTOROF THE
ESTATE OF RICHARD BLACKMAN, and
JOHN DOES #1-10,
Defendants.
--------------------------------------------------------X
SPATT, District Judge:
On July 29, 2011, the Plaintiff, individually and on behalf of other persons similarly
situated, commenced this action against the Defendants, pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act
(“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 207, and 216, New York Labor Law § 663, NYLL, §§ 190 et seq., and
the 12 New York Codes, Rules and Regulations (“NYCRR”) § 142-2.2.
On November 9, 2018, the Court reviewed a settlement of the action pursuant to a fairness
hearing under the authority of Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc., 796 F.3d 199 (2d Cir.
2015). During the hearing, the Court approved the proposed settlement, but reserved decision
regarding the amount of attorney’s fees to-be-awarded pending a formal application by the
Plaintiffs.

1

Case 2:11-cv-03655-ADS-AKT Document 209 Filed 05/28/20 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 4336

On May 31, 2019, the Plaintiffs moved for an award of attorney’s fees and costs, pursuant
to 29 U.S.C. § 216(b) and New York Labor Law § 198.
On June 4, 2019, the Court referred the matter to United States Magistrate Judge A.
Kathleen Tomlinson for a recommendation as to whether the motion should be granted, and if so,
what relief, if any, should be awarded.
On May 4, 2020, Judge Tomlinson issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) that the
Plaintiffs be awarded attorney’s fees in the sum of $168,032.70 and costs in the sum of $350. With
regard to costs, the Plaintiffs sought to $10,860.57 in costs as follows: (1) $350.00 for the filing fee;
(2) $210.00 for service of process; (3) $9,827.57 for deposition transcripts; and (4) $473.00 for mailing.
In support of these costs, Plaintiffs submitted billing records which itemized the expenses but failed to
provide the underlying documentation such as invoices, receipts or other documentary proof. Thus, the
R&R also recommended that the Plaintiffs be given 30 days to provide the missing documentation of
their costs as set forth in this Report and Recommendation.
That same day, Judge Tomlinson electronically served the R&R on the parties. It has been

more than fourteen days since the service of the R&R, and the parties have not filed objections.
As such, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72, this Court
has reviewed the R&R for clear error, and finding none, now concurs in both its reasoning and its
result. See Coburn v. P.N. Fin., No. 13-CV-1006 (ADS) (SIL), 2015 WL 520346, at *1 (E.D.N.Y.
Feb. 9, 2015) (reviewing Report and Recommendation without objections for clear error).
On May 20, 2020, the Plaintiffs submitted an affidavit, attaching the documentation
requested by the R&R outlining their costs. The Court has reviewed those documents, and finds
that the Plaintiffs adequately demonstrated that they incurred legal costs totaling $10,860.57.

2

Case 2:11-cv-03655-ADS-AKT Document 209 Filed 05/28/20 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 4337

Accordingly, the R&R is adopted in its entirety. The Court awards the Plaintiffs attorney’s
fees in the sum of $168.032.70 and costs in the sum of $10,860.57. Pursuant to the Court’s ruling
at the November 9, 2018 hearing finding that the of the settlement complies with Cheeks, the Clerk
of the Court is respectfully directed to close the case.

SO ORDERED.
Dated: Central Islip, New York
May 28, 2020
___/s/ Arthur D. Spatt_______
ARTHUR D. SPATT
United States District Judge

3