United States of America v. Leap et al

Filing 23

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. As set forth in the attached Order, the Court adopts the March 6, 2013 Report and Recommendation of Judge Wall as if set forth herein. Accordingly, plaintiff's motion for a default judgment is denied w ithout prejudice and plaintiff is granted leave to file and serve a Second Amended Complaint. The Second Amended Complaint must be filed no later than April 30, 2013. Should plaintiff not file an amended pleading by this deadline, the action will be marked closed. Plaintiff's counsel is directed to serve a copy of this Order on the remaining defendants and to file proof of service on ECF. Ordered by Judge Denis R. Hurley on 4/17/2013. (Spatola, Richard)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK --------------------------------------------------------X UNITED STATES, Plaintiff, -against- ORDER 11 CV 4822 (DRH) (WDW) GLORIA LEAP, LAWRENCE EUGENE LaTERZA, and NASSAU COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, Defendants. --------------------------------------------------------X HURLEY, Senior District Judge: On January 7, 2013, plaintiff moved pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(b) for a default judgment against defendants Gloria Leap, Lawrence Eugene LaTerza, and Nassau County Department of Social Services. (See Docket No. 17.) On January 22, 2013, this matter was referred to United States Magistrate Judge William D. Wall to issue a report and recommendation as to whether plaintiff had demonstrated that the allegations in the Complaint establish the defendants’ liability such that the motion for default judgment should be granted, and if so, to determine the appropriate amount of damages, costs, and or/fees, if any, to be awarded. On March 6, 2013, Judge Wall issued a Report and Recommendation which recommended that “the motion be denied at this time without prejudice and that the plaintiff be given an opportunity to file and serve a Second Amended Complaint that will include sufficient allegations in support of the relief sought.” (Docket No. 19 at 1.) More than fourteen days have elapsed since service of the Report and Recommendation and no party has filed an objection. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72, this Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation for clear error, and finding none, now concurs in both its reasoning and its result. As such, the Court adopts Judge Wall’s March 6, 2013 Report and Recommendation as if set forth herein. Accordingly, plaintiff’s motion for a default judgment is denied without prejudice and plaintiff is granted leave to file and serve a Second Amended Complaint.1 The Second Amended Complaint must be filed no later than April 30, 2013. Should plaintiff not file an amended pleading by this deadline, the action will be marked closed. Plaintiff’s counsel is directed to serve a copy of this Order on the remaining defendants and to file proof of service on ECF. SO ORDERED. Dated: Central Islip, New York April 17, 2013 /s/ Denis R. Hurley Unites States District Judge 1 In filing the amended pleading, plaintiff should take into consideration the Court’s June 6, 2012 Order which questioned whether the Nassau County Department of Social Services is the proper defendant as distinct from the County of Nassau. (See Docket No. 14.) 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?