Anderson v. Spizziota et al

Filing 559

ORDER It is hereby Order that Charles Raymond McClendon, Jarrot Jones, Andre Rhodes, Otoniel Castillo Recinos, Richard Jones, Edwin Morejon, James Erickson, Vidal Espinal and John Jiminez must each serve and file an affidavit on or before May 10, 20 13 providing the Court with a new address and telephone number at which he can be contacted. THE ABOVE-REFERENCED PLAINTIFFS ARE ADVISED THAT A FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER WILL RESULT IN THAT PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS BEING DISMISSED IN THEIR ENT IRETY WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO RULES37(b){2){A)(v) AND 4l(b) OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. Charles Raymond McClendon, Jarrot Jones, Andre Rhodes, Otoniel Castillo Recinos, Richard Jones, Edwin Morejon, James Erickson, Vidal Espinal and J ohn Jiminez must eachserve and file an affidavit on or before May 10, 2013 providing the Court with a new address andtelephone number at which he can be contacted.THE ABOVE-REFERENCED PLAINTIFFS ARE ADVISED THAT A FAILURE TOCOMPLY WITH THIS ORDER WIL L RESULT IN THAT PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS BEINGDISMISSED IN THEIR ENTIRETY WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO RULES37(b){2){A)(v) AND 4l(b) OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. Pursuant to Rule 77(d)(l) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Clerk o f the Courtis directed to serve notice of entry of this order upon all parties to the consolidated action in accordance with Rule 5(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, including mailing a copy of this order to each plaintiffs address of reco rd pursuant to Rule 5(b)(C) and leaving a copy of this order with the Clerk of the Court pursuant to Rule 5(b)(C) and leaving a copy of this Order with the Clerk of the Court pursuant to Rule 5(b)(2)(D). So Ordered. Ordered by Judge Sandra J. Feuerstein on 4/24/2013. (Padilla, Kristin)

Download PDF
• UNITED STATES DISTRJCT COURT EASTERN DJSTRJCT OF NEW YORK * ----------------------------------------------------)( WALTER LEE ANDERSON, et al., " ' 2:4 2013 * LONG I::!..ANu OFFICE Plaintiffs, ORDER 11-CV-5663 (SJF)(WDW) -againstMICHAEL SPOSATO, individually and in his official capacity as Nassau County Sheriff, et al., Defendants. ----------------------------------------------------)( FEUERSTEIN, District Judge By Order dated February 13, 2012 (the "Consolidation Order"),inter alia: (a) thirty-three (33) complaints brought by incarceratedpro se plaintiffs pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 ("Section 1983") challenging the conditions at the Nassau County Correctional Center ("NCCC") were consolidated for all purposes to proceed under the lead case, Anderson. et al. v. Sposato, et al, No. 11-CV-5663; and (b) all subsequently filed prose actions relating to the subject matter of the consolidated action were directed to be consolidated under the lead case docket number. Mail sent by the Court to the following nine (9) plaintiffs in the consolidated action have been returned as undeliverable: Charles Raymond McClendon (Doc. Nos. 272, 283, 357, 374, 465, 544); Jarrot Jones (Doc. Nos. 284, 347,456, 524); Andre Rhodes (Doc. Nos. 358, 362, 364, 498); Otoniel Castillo Recinos (Doc. Nos. 382, 450, 528 and 545); Richard Jones (Doc. No. 4 72); Edwin Morejon (Doc. No. 485); James Erickson (Doc. No. 535); Vidal Espinal (Doc. No. 543); and John Jiminez (Doc. No. 553). None of those plaintiffs have notified the Court of a change of address or otherwise provided updated contact information. "The duty to inform the Court and defendants of any change of address is 'an obligation that rests with all prose plaintiffs."' Alomar v. RecarQ, No. 07-CV-5654, 2010 WL 451047, at* 2 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 9, 2010) (quoting Handlin v. Garvey, No. 91 Civ. 6777, 1996 WL 673823, at* 5 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 20, 1996)); see also Hayes v. ShieiQ, No. II Civ. 3714,2012 WL 3114843, at* I l (S.D.N.Y. July 5, 2012), report and recommendation adopted ]1y 2012 WL 3115798 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. I, 2012); Ackridge v. Martine<, No. 09 Civ. 10400,2011 WL 5865265, at* 3 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 22, 20 II) ("[W]hen a party changes addresses, it is his obligation to notify the court of his new address."). The above-named plaintiffs cannot proceed with their claims unless the Court and defense counsel are able to contact them to ,inter alia, obtain discovery, serve motions and schedule trial. See,~ United States ex rei. Roundtree v. Health and Hospitals Police Dept. of New York: No. 06 Civ. 212,2007 WL 1428428, at* I, 2 (S.D.N.Y. May 14, 2007) (holding that "defendants are at a severe disadvantage in not knowing the address of the prose litigant who has brought suit against them."); Coleman v. Doe, No. 05-cv-5849, 2006 WL 2357846, at • 3 (E.D.N.Y. Aug. 14, 2006) ("To require defendants to move forward would be impossible without plaintiffs participation.") "When a pro se litigant fails to provide the Court with notice of a change of address, the Court may dismiss the litigant's claims." Bernard v. Rome!], No. II cv 6346,2012 WL 6594622, at* 2 (E.D.N.Y. Oct. 15, 2012), report and recommendation adopted ]1y 2012 WL 6594525 (E.D.N.Y. Dec. 18, 2012). Accordingly, Charles Raymond McClendon, Jarrot Jones, Andre Rhodes, Otoniel Castillo Recinos, Richard Jones, Edwin Morejon, James Erickson, Vidal Espinal and John Jiminez must each serve and file an affidavit on or before May 10, 2013 providing the Court with a new address and telephone number at which he can be contacted. THE ABOVE-REFERENCED PLAINTIFFS ARE ADVISED THAT A FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER WILL RESULT IN THAT PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS BEING DISMISSED IN THEIR ENTIRETY WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO RULES 37(b){2){A)(v) AND 4l(b) OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. Pursuant to Rule 77(d)(l) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Clerk of the Court is directed to serve notice of entry of this order upon all parties to the consolidated action in accordance with Rule 5(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, including mailing a copy of 2 this order to each plaintiffs address of record pursuant to Rule 5(b)(C) and leaving a copy of this order with the Clerk of the Court pursuant to Rule 5(b )(?Vn' SO ORDERED. /s/ Sandra J. Feuerstein Dated: April24, 2013 Central Islip, New York 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?