Andersen v. North Shore Long Island Jewish Healthcare System's Zucker Hillside Hospital et al

Filing 160

ORDER re 157 : see attached Order for details. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Arlene R. Lindsay on 12/3/2013. c/ecf (Johnston, Linda)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------------X LAUREN ANDERSEN, Plaintiff, ORDER CV 12-1049 (JFB)(ARL) -againstNORTH SHORE LONG ISLAND JEWISH HEALTHCARE SYSTEM’S ZUCKER HILLSIDE HOSPITAL, et al., Defendants. -------------------------------------------------------------X LINDSAY, Magistrate Judge: Before the court is the pro se plaintiff Lauren Andersen’s letter motion dated November 8, 2013 requesting a conference to discuss defense counsel’s alleged misrepresentation of facts made in a response to plaintiff’s application to the district court for sanctions and for an extension of time to oppose defendants’ motion to dismiss. Defendants have not responded to the motion. Plaintiff’s motion is denied. By Order dated September 13, 2013, the district court ruled on the plaintiff’s application, inter alia, denying the motion for sanctions and granting the motion for an extension of time to file. In her letter application to the undersigned, plaintiff makes reference to her letter to Judge Bianco dated September 16, 2013 which discusses defense counsel’s alleged misrepresentation of facts. Plaintiff’s application concerns motion practice that was made to and ruled upon by the district court. If the plaintiff has any questions concerning the proper form or procedure for filing a letter motion, she is directed to contact the pro se office at (631) 712-6060 for additional assistance. Defendants are directed to serve a copy of this Order on the pro se plaintiff forthwith. Dated: Central Islip, New York December 3, 2013 SO ORDERED: __________/s________________ ARLENE R. LINDSAY United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?