Martinez v. DeMarco et al

Filing 8

ORDER - Pursuant to the Court's January 23, 2012 Order of Consolidation, the Court has reviewed the instant Complaint and finds that it relates to the subject matter of the Consolidated Action, Butler, et al. v. DeMarco, et al., 11-cv-2602 ( JS)(GRB). Accordingly, this action shall be consolidated with the Consolidated Action. A copy of the Order of Consolidation and the operative complaint in Butler--the Consolidated Amended Complaint--are annexed to this Order. If Plaintiff does not wi sh to proceed as part of the Consolidated Action he must so indicate in a letter to the Court within thirty (30) days of receiving a copy of this Order. Upon receipt of such a letter, the Court will direct the Clerk of the Court to sever this Complai nt from the Consolidated Amended Complaint and reopen and reinstate his individual pro se action. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma paup eris status is denied for the purpose of any appeal. The Clerk of the Court is directed to mail a copy of this Order, the Order of Consolidation, and the Consolidated Amended to the pro se Plaintiff at his last known address. So Ordered by Judge Joanna Seybert on 12/5/12. Attachments: # 1 Consolidation Order; # 2 Consolidated Amended Complaint. C/M (Valle, Christine)

Download PDF
FILED  CLERK    12/5/2012 2:23 pm   U.S. DISTRICT COURT  EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK  LONG ISLAND OFFICE  UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ----------------------------------X SABAS MARTINEZ, Plaintiff, ORDER 12-CV-5000 (JS)(GRB) -againstVINCENT F. DeMARCO, Individually and in his official capacity as Sheriff of Suffolk County, and CHARLES EWALD, Superintendent of Suffolk County Jails, Defendants. ----------------------------------X APPEARANCES: Plaintiff Sabas Martinez, Pro Se 308488 Suffolk County Correctional Facility 110 Center Drive Riverhead, NY 11901 Defendants: No Appearances. SEYBERT, District Judge: Pursuant to the Court’s January 23, 2012 Order of Consolidation, the Court has reviewed the instant Complaint and finds that it relates to the subject matter of the Consolidated Action, Butler, et al. v. DeMarco, et al., 11-CV-2602 (JS)(GRB). Accordingly, this action shall be consolidated with the Consolidated Action. This affects Plaintiff in the following ways: 1. Plaintiff in this action shall become part of the putative class in Butler (11-CV-2602); 2. Any claims in the instant Complaint that are not included in the Consolidated Amended Complaint in Butler shall be severed (See Order of Consolidation at 17 (describing the process for proceeding with any severed claims after the resolution of the Consolidated Action)); and 3. Plaintiff shall be represented by pro bono counsel, Shearman & Sterling LLP.1 A copy of the Order of Consolidation and the operative complaint in Butler–-the Consolidated Amended Complaint–-are annexed to this Order. If Plaintiff does not wish to proceed as part of the Consolidated Action he must so indicate in a letter to the Court within thirty (30) days of receiving a copy of this Order. Upon receipt of such a letter, the Court will direct the Clerk of the Court to sever this Complaint from the Consolidated Amended Complaint and reopen and reinstate his individual pro se action. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of any appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45, 82 S. Ct. 917, 8 L. Ed. 2d 21 (1962). The Clerk of the Court is directed to mail a copy of this Order, the Order of Consolidation, and the Consolidated Amended 1 Counsel’s mailing address is: Lynch v. DeMarco Case Team c/o Shearman & Sterling LLP 599 Lexington Avenue New York, NY 10022 Counsel’s telephone number is: (212) 848-8023. Complaint to the pro se Plaintiff at his last known address. SO ORDERED. /s/ JOANNA SEYBERT JOANNA SEYBERT, U.S.D.J. Dated: December 5, 2012 Central Islip, New York

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?