Pittman v. Suffolk County P.D. H. A 5th Precient et al

Filing 52

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: On September 9, 2016, United States Magistrate Judge Anne Y. Shields issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that this Court dismiss the instant action with prejudice for Plaintiff's failure to prosecute pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Any written objections to the Report and Recommendation had to be filed with the Clerk of Court within fourteen (14) days of service of the report. To date, no objections have been filed. Where no objections to a Report and Recommendation have been filed, "the district court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record." The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation for clear error and, finding none, hereby adopts Magistrate Judge Shields Report and Recommendation as the opinion of this Court. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this order and close this case. The Clerk of Court is further directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff. Ordered by Judge LaShann DeArcy Hall on 1/6/2017. (Basnight, Jasmine)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ----------------------------------------------------------------x JOSEPH PITTMAN, Plaintiff, ORDER 13-CV-2462 (LDH) (AYS) -againstSUFFOLK COUNTY P.D.H.Q. 5th Precinct, P.O. ROBERT E. LANDGROVER # 5624, P.O. MICHAEL L. CAMPBELL # 5346 and P.O. ADAM R. FRIEDLANDER # 1368, Defendants. ----------------------------------------------------------------x LASHANN DEARCY HALL, United States District Judge: On September 9, 2016, United States Magistrate Judge Anne Y. Shields issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that this Court dismiss the instant action with prejudice for Plaintiff’s failure to prosecute pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Any written objections to the Report and Recommendation had to be filed with the Clerk of Court within fourteen (14) days of service of the report. To date, no objections have been filed. Where no objections to a Report and Recommendation have been filed, “the district court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record.” Estate of Ellington ex rel. Ellington v. Harbrew Imports Ltd., 812 F. Supp. 2d 186, 189 (E.D.N.Y. 2011) (quoting Urena v. New York, 160 F. Supp. 2d 606, 609-10 (S.D.N.Y. 2001)) (internal quotation marks and citations omitted). 1 The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation for clear error and, finding none, hereby adopts Magistrate Judge Shield’s Report and Recommendation as the opinion of this Court. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this order and close this case. The Clerk of Court is further directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff. Dated: January 6, 2017 Brooklyn, New York SO ORDERED: /s/ LDH LASHANN DEARCY HALL United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?