Trustees of Empire State Carpenters Annuity, Apprenticeship, Labor-Management Cooperation, Pension and Welfare Funds v. Curtis Partition Corp.
Filing
15
ADOPTION ORDER - Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72, this Court has reviewed the February 11, 2015, Report and Recommendation for clear error, and finding none, now concurs in both its reasoning and its result. See Coburn v. P.N. Fin., No. 13-CV-1006 (ADS)(SIL), 2015 WL 520346, at *1 (E.D.N.Y. Feb. 9, 2015)(reviewing Report and Recommendation without objections for clear error). Accordingly, the February 11, 2015 Report and Recommendation is adopted in its entirety, and the Funds motion for a default judgment is denied with leave to renew. The Funds may re-file their motion for a default judgment with supplemental documentation within 30 days of the date of this order. So Ordered by Judge Arthur D. Spatt on 2/26/2015. (Coleman, Laurie)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
---------------------------------------------------------X
TRUSTEES OF EMPIRE STATE
CARPENTERS ANNUITY, APPRENTICESHIP,
LABOR-MANAGEMENT COOPERATION,
PENSION and WELFARE FUNDS,
ADOPTION ORDER
14-cv-324 (ADS)(ARL)
Plaintiffs,
-againstCURTIS PARTITION CORP.,
Defendant.
---------------------------------------------------------X
APPEARANCES:
Virginia & Ambinder, LLP
Attorneys for the Plaintiffs
111 Broadway, Suite 1403
New York, NY 10006
By: Richard B. Epstein, Esq.
Elina Turetskaya, Esq., of counsel
NO APPEARANCES:
The Defendant
SPATT, District Judge.
On January 15, 2014, the Plaintiffs Trustees of the Empire State Carpenters Annuity,
Labor-Management Cooperation, Pension and Welfare Funds (collectively the “Funds”)
commenced this action against the Defendant Curtis Partition Corp. (the “Defendant”) under
Section 502(a)(3) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended, 29
U.S.C. § 1132(a)(3); Section 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947, as amended,
29 U.S.C. § 1985; and Section 9 of the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. § 9, to confirm and
enforce an arbitrator’s award rendered pursuant to a collective bargaining agreement between the
1
Empire State Regional Council of Carpenters and The Association of Wall, Ceiling, and
Carpentry Industry of New York.
On February 16, 2014, the Clerk of the Court noted the default of the Defendant.
On April 2, 2014, the Funds moved for a default judgment.
On April 5, 2014, the Court referred this matter to United States Magistrate Judge Arlene
R. Lindsay for a recommendation as to whether the motion for a default judgment should be
granted, and if so, whether damages should be awarded, including reasonable attorney’s fees and
costs.
On February 11, 2015, Judge Lindsay issued a Report recommending that the Funds’
motion for a default judgment be denied with leave to renew. Judge Lindsay reached this
recommendation in part because she could not infer a ground for the award of $4,141.26 in
principal. Further, because there was no indication when the principal was paid, Judge Lindsay
found that she could not assess whether there was a colorable justification for the interest award.
More than fourteen days have elapsed since service of the Report and Recommendation
on the Funds, who have failed to file an objection.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72, this Court has
reviewed the February 11, 2015, Report and Recommendation for clear error, and finding none,
now concurs in both its reasoning and its result. See Coburn v. P.N. Fin., No. 13-CV-1006
(ADS)(SIL), 2015 WL 520346, at *1 (E.D.N.Y. Feb. 9, 2015)(reviewing Report and
Recommendation without objections for clear error). Accordingly, the February 11, 2015 Report
and Recommendation is adopted in its entirety, and the Funds’ motion for a default judgment is
denied with leave to renew. The Funds may re-file their motion for a default judgment with
supplemental documentation within 30 days of the date of this order.
2
SO ORDERED.
Dated: Central Islip, New York
February 26, 2015
_
Arthur D. Spatt
ARTHUR D. SPATT
United States District Judge
3
_
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?