Clinton v. Community Market
ORDER re: 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. The Clerk of the Court shall forward the Summons, Complaint, and this Order to the USMS and the USMS shall serve the Defendant. Ordered by Judge Joanna Seybert on 5/12/2014. (C/M Plaintiff) (Nohs, Bonnie)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Ayesha Clinton, pro se
61 East Greenwich Avenue
Roosevelt, NY 11575
SEYBERT, District Judge:
On April 10, 2014, pro se plaintiff Ayesha Clinton
(“Plaintiff”) filed a Complaint pursuant to Title VII of the Civil
Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), as codified, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e
to 2000e-17, against Community Market (“Defendant”) alleging that
Defendant discriminated against her on the basis of her race and
Plaintiff’s Complaint is accompanied by an application to
proceed in forma pauperis.
Upon review of Plaintiff’s declaration in support of her
application to proceed in forma pauperis, the Court finds that
Plaintiff’s financial status qualifies her to commence this action
without prepayment of the filing fees. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1).
Accordingly, Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis
is GRANTED and the Court ORDERS service of the Complaint by the
United States Marshal Service (“USMS”) without prepayment of the
The Clerk of the Court shall forward the Summons, the
Complaint, and this Order to the USMS and the USMS shall serve the
The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3)
that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith
and therefore in forma pauperis status is DENIED for the purpose of
See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45,
82 S. Ct. 917, 8 L. Ed. 2d 21 (1962).
The Clerk of the Court is further directed to mail a copy
of this Order to the pro se Plaintiff.
12 , 2014
Central Islip, New York
/s/ JOANNA SEYBERT
Joanna Seybert, U.S.D.J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?