Elkind et al v. Revlon Consumer Products Corporation
REFERRAL ORDER - Plaintiff's motion to amend at Docket Entry 93 is REFERRED to Magistrate Judge A. Kathleen Tomlinson pursuant to Rule 72(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for DECISION. The parties are directed to address all future filings related to this motion to Judge Tomlinson. So Ordered by Judge Joanna Seybert on 10/6/2015. C/ECF (Valle, Christine)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
ANNE ELKIND and SHARON ROSEN,
on behalf of themselves and all
others similarly situated,
-againstREVLON CONSUMER PRODUCTS
John Joseph Fitzgerald IV, Esq.
Thomas A. Canova, Esq.
Tran H. Nguyen, Esq.
Trevor Flynn, Esq.
Law Office of Jack Fitzgerald, PC
3636 Fourth Ave, Suite 202
San Diego, CA 92103
Ronald A. Marron, Esq.
Skye Resendes, Esq.
Law Offices of Ronald A. Marron
651 Arroyo Drive
San Diego, CA 92103
Patricia Glaser, Esq.
Sean Riley, Esq.
10250 Constellation Blvd, 19th Fl.
Los Angeles, CA 90067
Jill Caroline Barnhart, Esq.
Nelson A. Boxer, Esq.
Petrillo Klein & Boxer LLP
655 Third Ave, 22nd Fl.
New York, NY 10017
SEYBERT, District Judge:
REFERRED to Magistrate Judge A. Kathleen Tomlinson pursuant to
Rule 72(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for DECISION.
See Fielding v. Tollaksen, 510 F.3d 175, 178 (2d Cir. 2007) (“As
nondispositive motions, such as a motion to amend the complaint,
to a magistrate judge for decision without the parties’ consent.”);
Dollar Phone Corp. v. St. Paul Fire, No. 09-CV-1640, 2011 WL
837793, at *1 (E.D.N.Y. Mar. 4, 2011) (collecting cases); see also
Pagano v. Frank, 983 F.2d 343, 346 (1st Cir. 1993); Hall v. Norfolk
S. Ry. Co., 469 F.3d 590, 595 (7th Cir. 2006).
The parties are
directed to address all future filings related to this motion to
/s/ JOANNA SEYBERT______
Joanna Seybert, U.S.D.J.
6 , 2015
Central Islip, New York
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?