Ezpino v. CDL Underground Specialists, Inc. et al

Filing 54

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The Court adopts the June 30, 2017 Report and Recommendation of Judge Locke as if set forth herein. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the revised settlement agreement of the parties is hereby approved. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. Ordered by Judge Denis R. Hurley on 7/17/2017. (Gapinski, Michele)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -----------------------------------------------------X ADOLIO ANTONIO EZPINO, on behalf of himself and all those similarly situated ORDER ADOPTING R & R Civil Action No. 14-3173 (DRH)(siL) Plaintiffs, -againstCDL UNDERGROUND SPECIALISTS, INC. d/b/a CDL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES, and CHRISTOPHER ABRUZZO, Defendants. -----------------------------------------------------X HURLEY, Senior District Judge: Presently before the Court is the Report and Recommendation, dated June 30, 2017, of Magistrate Judge Steven I. Locke recommending that Joint Motion for Approval of Settlement and Dismissal with Prejudice of Claims be granted to the extent that the revised settlement agreement be approved. More than fourteen days have elapsed since service of the Report and Recommendation and no objections have been filed. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72, this Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation for clear error, and finding none, now concurs in both its reasoning and its result. The Court adopts the June 30, 2017 Report and Recommendation of Judge Locke as if set forth herein. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the revised settlement agreement of the parties is hereby approved. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. Dated: Central Islip, N.Y. July 17, 2017 /s/ Denis R. Hurley Denis R. Hurley United States District Judge Page 1 of 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?