Ford v. VOXX International Corporation et al

Filing 15

MEMORANDUM & ORDER ADOPTING REPORT & RECOMMENDATION - Judge Shields' R&R (Docket Entry 14) is ADOPTED in its entirety and Plaintiffs' motion (Docket Entry 11) is GRANTED. The Court hereby appoints the Union Funds as lead plaintiffs and Robbins Geller as lead counsel in this case. So Ordered by Judge Joanna Seybert on 7/16/2015. C/ECF (Valle, Christine)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------X BRIAN FORD, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM & ORDER 14-CV-4183(JS)(AYS) -againstVOXX INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, PATRICK M. LAVELLE, and CHARLES MICHAEL STOEHR, Defendants. ------------------------------------X APPEARANCES For Plaintiffs: For Defendants: Samuel H. Rudman, Esq. Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd, LLP 58 South Service Road Suite 200 Melville, NY 11747 John A. Neuwirth, Esq. Caroline Jane Hickey, Esq. Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP 767 Fifth Avenue New York, NY 10153 SEYBERT, District Judge: Pending before the Court is Magistrate Judge Anne Y. Shield’s Report and Recommendation (“R&R”), recommending that the Court grant a motion made by the Asbestos Workers Philadelphia Pension Fund (“the Asbestos Workers Fund”), IBEW Local 98 Pension Fund (“IBEW Local 98”), and Plumbers Local No. 98 Defined Benefit Pension Fund (“Plumbers Local 98” and together with Asbestos Workers Fund, and IBEW Local 98, the “Union Funds”), as lead plaintiffs in this case, and approve firm of Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP (“Robbins Geller”) as lead counsel. (Docket Entry 14) For the following reasons, the Court ADOPTS Judge Shields’ R&R in its entirety. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Brian Ford (“Plaintiff”) commenced this securities class action on July 8, 2014 against defendants VOXX International Corporation (“VOXX” or the “Company”), Patrick M. Lavelle, and Charles Michael Stoehr (collectively, “Defendants”). Plaintiffs allege that Defendants violated Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and seek to recover losses allegedly incurred as the result of class members’ purchase of VOXX’s common stock. (Compl. ¶¶ 1, 15.) On September 8, 2014, the Union Funds moved to appoint themselves as the lead plaintiffs in this case and to appoint Robbins Geller as lead counsel. (Docket Entry 11.) On April 13, 2015, Judge Shields issued her R&R recommending that the Court enter an order: (1) appointing the Union Funds as lead plaintiffs in this case, and (2) appointing Robbins Geller as lead counsel. (R&R at 7.) DISCUSSION In reviewing an R&R, a district court “may accept, reject, or modify, recommendations made in by whole the or in part, magistrate the judge.” findings 28 and U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). If no timely objections have been made, the “court 2 need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record.” Urena v. New York, 160 F. Supp. 2d 606, 609-10 (S.D.N.Y. 2001) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). Objections were due within fourteen days of service of the R&R. The time for filing objections has expired, and no party has objected. Accordingly, all objections are hereby deemed to have been waived. Upon careful review and consideration, the Court finds Judge Shields’ R&R to be comprehensive, well-reasoned, and free of clear error, and it ADOPTS the R&R in its entirety. CONCLUSION Judge Shields’ R&R (Docket Entry 14) is ADOPTED in its entirety and Plaintiffs’ motion (Docket Entry 11) is GRANTED. The Court hereby appoints the Union Funds as lead plaintiffs and Robbins Geller as lead counsel in this case. SO ORDERED. /s/ JOANNA SEYBERT______ Joanna Seybert, U.S.D.J. Dated: July 16 , 2015 Central Islip, NY 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?