Castro v. Barroso Rodriguez et al
Filing
38
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 30 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 36 Motion for Summary Judgment. For the reasons stated herein, Defendants' motion for summary judgment is granted in part and denied inpart. Defendant Ryde r Truck Rental, Lt. is hereby dismissed from this action and the Clerk of the Court is directed to terminate them as a party. Plaintiff'smotion for summary judgment is denied in its entirety. Jury selection remains scheduled for June 19,2017 at 9:30a.m. (Ordered by Judge Leonard D. Wexler on 6/6/2017.) (Fagan, Linda)
FJ LED
IN CLERK'S OFFICE
U.S. DISTRICT COURT E. D. N.Y.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
*
----------------------------------------------------------------------)(
LONG ISLAND OFFICE
ANTHONY CASTRO,
Plaintiff,
JUN 0 6 2017
*
ORDER
cv 15-3590
-againstJUAN CARLOS RODRIGUEZ, RYDER
TRUCK RENTAL, LT. and QUIVICAN TRUCKING
CORP.,
Defendants.
----------------------------------------------------------------------)(
This is a diversity action for personal injury arising out of an automobile accident that
occurred on January 30,2015. The sole cause of action is for negligence, pursuant to Section
5102 of the New York Insurance Law. Presently before the Court are the parties' cross-motions
for summary judgment.
Having reviewed the papers in support of and in opposition to the motion for summary
judgment, the Court finds that genuine issues of material fact exist with respect to both liability
and the extent of Plaintiffs injuries, which preclude the entry of summary judgment at this time.
The parties may renew their arguments at the time of trial.
Defendants' motion for summary judgment is granted in part, however, solely with
respect to Plaintiffs ability to bring this action against Ryder Truck Rental, Lt. ("Ryder").
Defendants argue in their motion papers that, pursuant to the Graves Amendment, 49 U.S.C. ยง
30106, Ryder may not be held vicariously liable for Plaintiffs injuries merely because it rented
the truck at issue herein to Defendant Quivican Trucking Corp. ("Quivican"). See Graham v.
Dunkley, 852 N.Y.S.2d 169 (2d Dep't 2008). Defendants offer the rental agreement between
-1-
Ryder and Quivican, signed July 8, 2008, as evidence that Ryder had no role in the underlying
accident other than the fact that it rented the automobile at issue to Quivican.
In his opposition to Defendants' motion, Plaintiff fails to address in any way the
arguments offered by Defendants for Ryder's dismissal. "Federal courts may deem a claim
abandoned when a party moves for summary judgment on one ground and the party opposing
sununary judgment fails to address the argument in any way." Maher v. Alliance Mortgage
Banking Com., 650 F. Supp. 2d 249, 267 (E.D.N.Y. 2009) (quotation omitted) (citing cases);
Ostroski v. Town of Southold, 443 F. Supp. 2d 325, 340 (E.D.N.Y. 2006) ("Because plaintiff's
opposition papers did not address defendants' motion for summary judgment on this claim, the
claim is deemed abandoned and summary judgment could be granted on that basis alone.").
Accordingly, Defendants' motion for summary judgment is granted in part and denied in
part. For the reasons set forth above, Defendant Ryder Truck Rental, Lt. is hereby dismissed
from this action and the Clerk of the Court is directed to terminate them as a party. Plaintiff's
motion for sununary judgment is denied in its entirety. Jury selection remains scheduled for June
19,2017 at 9:30a.m.
SO ORDERED:
Dated: Central Islip, New York
June 6, 2017
"Y--
'
LEONARD D. WEXLER
United States District Judge
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?