Gilday et al v. SDS Telecom Inc. et al

Filing 27

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS : The Court adopts Judge Brown's R&R in its entirety. As to whether the additional materials submitted by Plaintiff warrant an award of damages, that matter is referred to Magistrate Judge Brown for Repo rt and Recommendation. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's renewed motion for damages is denied without prejudice; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this matter is referred to Magistrate Judge Brown for a Report and Recommendation as to whether the additional materials submitted by Plaintiff warrant an award of damages. See attached. Ordered by Judge Denis R. Hurley on 9/18/2018. (Gapinski, Michele)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -----------------------------------------------------X JOHN W. GILDAY, as Executive Director of the ELECTRICAL INDUSTRY BOARD OF NASSAU AND SUFFOLK COUNTIES, NEW YORK, KEVIN Business Manager of LOCAL UNION NO. 25 INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS and JOHN DOE and JANE DOE, beneficiaries of the TRUST FUNDS Administered by the ELECTRICAL BOARD OF NASSAU AND SUFFOLK COUNTIES, NEW YORK, Plaintiffs, -against- ORDER ADOPTING R & R Civil Action No. 15-6962 SDS TELECOM INC. and SEAN STEVENS, Defendants. -----------------------------------------------------X HURLEY, Senior District Judge: Presently before the Court is the Report and Recommendation, dated August 30, 2018 28, 2017 (“R&R”), of Magistrate Judge Gary R. Brown recommending that the renewed motion of plaintiffs for an award of damages against defendant SDS Telecom Inc. be denied without prejudice to renew. More than fourteen days have elapsed since service of the R&R. Plaintiff has filed a document denoted as objections to the report but which in actually is a submission of “additional clarifying information . . . to address concerns raised by [Judge Brown].” DE 26. In other words, Plaintiff does not dispute that the deficiencies noted by Judge Brown exist but rather seek to remedy them. Having reviewed the R&R de novo, the Court adopts it in its entirety. As to whether the Page 1 of 2 additional materials submitted by Plaintiff warrant an award of damages, that matter is referred to Magistrate Judge Brown for Report and Recommendation. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's renewed motion for damages is denied without prejudice; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this matter is referred to Magistrate Judge Brown for a Report and Recommendation as to whether the additional materials submitted by Plaintiff warrant an award of damages. Dated: Central Islip, N.Y. September 18, 2018 /s/ Denis R. Hurley Denis R. Hurley United States District Judge Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?