Gustavia Home, LLC v. Alvarez et al
Filing
24
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS : IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs motion for a default judgement against defendant MIGUEL ALVAREZ is granted to the extent that Plaintiff is awarded a total of $91,666.25, together with per diem pre -judgment interest in the amount of 15.07 per day from June 3, 2017 to the date judgment is entered and post-judgment interest pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1961(a) and the Court will on this date execute a Judgment of Foreclosure and Sale substantially in the revised form proposed by plaintiff. Ordered by Judge Denis R. Hurley on 7/12/2017. (Gapinski, Michele)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
--------------------------------------------------------X
GUSTAVIA HOME, LLC
ORDER ADOPTING R & R
Plaintiff,
16-CV-6633(DRH)(SIL)
-againstMIGUEL ALVAREZ
and JOHN DOE “1 through “12"said persons
having or claimed to have a right, title or interest
in the Mortgaged premises herein, their respective
names are presently unknown to the Plaintiff,
Defendants.
--------------------------------------------------------X
HURLEY, Senior District Judge:
Presently before the Court is the Report and Recommendation, dated June 2, 2017, of
Magistrate Judge Steven I. Locke recommending the following on plaintiff’s motion for default
judgment: (1) a default judgment be granted against Defendant Miguel Alvarez and that plaintiff
be awarded a total of $91,666.25, together with per diem pre-judgment interest in the amount of
15.07 per day until judgment is entered and post-judgment interest pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §
1961(a); and (2) that the request for a Judgment of Foreclosure and Sale be denied without
prejudice as Plaintiff has not indicated how it wishes to proceed with respect to Defendants John
Doe 1 through 12. More than fourteen days have elapsed since service of the Report and
Recommendation and no objections have been filed. However, after issuance the Report and
Recommendation plaintiff filed a notice of voluntary dismissal as against the Doe defendants.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72, this Court has reviewed the Report
and Recommendation for clear error, and finding none, now concurs in both its reasoning and
result as to that portion of the Report and Recommendation that recommended a default
judgment be granted against defendant Miguel Alvarez and that plaintiff be awarded a total of
$91,666.25, together with per diem pre-judgment interest in the amount of 15.07 per day until
judgment is entered and post-judgment interest pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1961(a). In view of the
subsequent dismissal of the claims against the Doe defendants, there is no reason to deny a
judgment of foreclosure and sale. As modified, the Court adopts the June 2, 2017 Report and
Recommendation of Judge Locke. Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for a default judgement against
defendant MIGUEL ALVAREZ is granted to the extent that Plaintiff is awarded a total of
$91,666.25, together with per diem pre-judgment interest in the amount of 15.07 per day from
June 3, 2017 to the date judgment is entered and post-judgment interest pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §
1961(a) and the Court will on this date execute a Judgment of Foreclosure and Sale substantially
in the revised form proposed by plaintiff.
Dated: Central Islip, N.Y.
July 12, 2017
/s/ Denis R. Hurley
Denis R. Hurley
United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?