Segura v. Griffin

Filing 12

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: Petitioner filed untimely objections to Magistrate Judge Bloom's Report and Recommendation (the "R&R") 10 , which recommends that the Court deny the Petition 1 for a Writ of Habeas Corpus. F ailure to timely file an objection to the R&R generally waives any further judicial review. DeLeon v. Strack, 234 F.3d 84, 86 (2d Cir. 2000). Nonetheless, the Court has considered Petitioner's objections, which simply rehash the arguments raised in his Petition and reply brief. None of those arguments provide a basis for relief. The Court has reviewed the R&R de novo and hereby ADOPTS the R&R in its entirety as the opinion of this Court. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(1), (3); 28 U.S.C. § 6 36(b)(1)(C). Accordingly, the Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus 1 is DENIED. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment, close the case, and mail a copy of this Order to the pro se litigant. Ordered by Judge LaShann DeArcy Hall on 1/25/2021. (Williams, Erica)

Case 2:16-cv-06688-LDH-LB Document 12 Filed 01/25/21 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 3174

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
CARLOS SEGURA,
Petitioner,

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT
AND RECOMMENDATION

v.

16-CV-06688 (LDH)(LB)

THOMAS GRIFFIN,
Respondent.
LASHANN DEARCY HALL, United States District Judge:

On December 17, 2019, Magistrate Judge Lois Bloom issued a Report and
Recommendation recommending that this Court deny the Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus.
The parties were given until December 31, 2019, to file objections to the Report and
Recommendation. Petitioner’s objections, signed by Petitioner on January 1, 2020, were filed
January 9, 2020. Failure to timely file an objection to the Report and Recommendation generally
waives any further judicial review. See DeLeon v. Strack, 234 F.3d 84, 86 (2d Cir. 2000).
Nonetheless, the Court has considered Petitioner’s objections, which simply rehash the
arguments raised in his Petition and reply brief. None of those arguments provide a basis for
relief. The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation de novo and hereby adopts it in
its entirety as the opinion of this Court. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(1), (3); 28 U.S.C.
§ 636(b)(1)(C). Accordingly, the Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED.

SO ORDERED:
Dated: Brooklyn, New York
January 25, 2021

/s/ LDH
LASHANN DEARCY HALL
United States District Judge

1