Certain Underwriters at LLoyd's London subscribing to the policy attaching to certificate No.BP/15-0489 v. EBE of NY, Inc. et al
Filing
33
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS : IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motions for a default judgement against defendant EBE of NY, Inc. and for summary judgment against defendant James Wrenn declaring there is no coverage are grant ed. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment declaring that there is no coverage under Underwriters' policy for Wrenn's claim in the action currently pending in New York State Supreme Court, Nassau County, styled James Wrenn v. AB C Corp d/b/a Vapor Smoke Shop, and bearing Index No.: 601450/2016 (the Underlying Action), and that Underwriters are not under a duty to defend or indemnify EBE or any other party with respect to the Underlying Action. See attached Order.Ordered by Judge Denis R. Hurley on 7/11/2018. (Gapinski, Michele)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
-------------------------------------------------------X
CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD’S
LONDON, subscribing to the policy attached
to Certificate no. BP/15-0489,
Plaintiff,
-againstEBE OF NY, INC., doing business as Vapor
Smoke Shop and JAMES WRENN,
ORDER ADOPTING R&R
16-CV-6938(DRH)(ARL)
Defendants.
-------------------------------------------------------X
Presently before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Arlene
R. Lindsay, dated June 20, 2018, (“R&R”), recommending the motions of plaintiff Certain
Underwriters at Lloyd’s London, subscribing to the policy attached to Certificate no. BP/15-0489
(“Underwriters’) (1) for a default judgment against defendant EBE of NY, Inc. (“EBE”) and (2)
for summary judgment against defendant James Wrenn (“Wrenn”), be granted. More than
fourteen days have elapsed since service of the R&R and no objections have been filed by
Defendants.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72, this Court has reviewed the Report
and Recommendation for clear error.
Both motions seeks the following relief:
an Order declaring that there is no coverage under Underwriters’
policy for Wrenn’s claim in the underlying action, and that
Underwriters are not under a duty to defend or indemnify EBE or
any other party with respect to the underlying action; awarding
Underwriters the costs of suit incurred herein, including reasonable
attorneys’ fees . . . .”
(Underwriters’ Mem. in Supp. of Default Judgment (DE 14-14) at 15; Underwriters’ Mem. in
Supp. of Summary Judgment (DE22-14) at 16.)
While Underwriters’ motion papers and the R&R address the issue of coverage and lack
of a duty to defend and/or indemnify, neither the motion papers nor the R&R address the
propriety of awarding attorney’s fees. Accordingly, the request for reasonable attorneys’ fees is
denied as abandoned. In all other respects, Judge Lindsay’s R&R is adopted. Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motions for a default judgement against
defendant EBE of NY, Inc. and for summary judgment against defendant James Wrenn declaring
there is no coverage are granted. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment declaring that
there is no coverage under Underwriters’ policy for Wrenn’s claim in the action currently
pending in New York State Supreme Court, Nassau County, styled James Wrenn v. “ABC Corp”
d/b/a Vapor Smoke Shop, and bearing Index No.: 601450/2016 (the “Underlying Action”) , and
that Underwriters are not under a duty to defend or indemnify EBE or any other party with
respect to the Underlying Action.
SO ORDERED.
Dated: Central Islip, N.Y.
July 11, 2018
/s/ Denis R. Hurley
Denis R. Hurley
United States District Judge
Page 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?