Bankers Standard Insruance Co. v. R.C. Complete Landscaping et al
Filing
18
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Plaintiff's motion for default judgment is granted and the court awards Plaintiff $183,465.43 in damages. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment for plaintiffs and close the case.Ordered by Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis on 3/28/2019. (Piper, Francine)
Np
1 •» DISTRICT COURT E.D,N.y.
CLERK'S OFFICE
US
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
X
.
*
... q
^^
*
IKOOiKLYlM ORFIICE
BANKERS STANDARD INSURANCE CO., as subrogee
ofRobyn Wolf-Eagle and Alan Eagle,
Plaintiff,
ORDER
17-CV-4415(NGG)
(GRB)
-againstR.C. COMPLETE LANDSCAPING and ROBERT
CERPENA,
Defendants.
-X
NICHOLAS G. GARAUFIS,United States District Judge.
Plaintiff Bankers Standard Insurance Co., as subrogee ofRobyn Wolf-Eagle and Alan
Eagle (the "Eagles"), alleges that "a vehicle operated by" Defendants R.C. Complete
Landscaping and Robert Cerpena collided with a wall ofthe Eagles' home while Defendants
performed landscaping work on or around July 30,2016, causing extensive damage to the house.
(Compl.(Dkt. 1)at UK 9-11,14-18; Aif. of Michael D. O'Donnell("O'Donnell Aff.")(Dkt. 151)K 4.) Pursuant to the Eagles' insurance policy. Plaintiff paid them $183,465.43 for damages
resulting from the accident. (O'Donnell Aff. K 6; s^ Damage Calculations(Dkt. 15-2).)
In this case. Plaintiff seeks the same amount in damages—$183,465.43—^from
Defendants. (O'Donnell Aff. If 15; Damage Calculations.) Plaintifffiled its complaint on July
26,2017. (Compl.) On March 27,2018, Plaintiff secured certificates of default as to both
Defendants. (Certificate ofDefault(Dkt. 14).) Plaintiffthen moved for defaultjudgment(Mot.
for Default J.("Mot.")(Dkt. 15)), and this court referred the motion to Magistrate Judge Gary R.
Brown(May 21,2018 Order)for a report & recommendation("R&R").
On February 27,2019, Judge Brown issued an R&R in which he recommended that this
court grant Plaintiff's motion and award Plaintiffthe damages it requests: $183,465.43. (R&R
(Dkt. 16) at 2.) According to Judge Brown,the record reflects that proper service was made on
Defendants,that Defendants did not file an answer or motion, and that the Clerk of Court
properly entered a notation of default pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55. (R&R at
1.) He found that Defendants' defaults "constitute 'an admission of all well-pleaded
allegations'" against them and that Plaintiff has demonstrated that its allegations establish a
subrogation claim against Defendants for property damage to the Eagles' home. (Id.(quoting
Vermont Teddv Bear Co. v. 1-800 BEARGRAM Co.. 373 F.3d 241,246(2d Cir. 2004)).) He
further found that Plaintiff had established through documentary evidence, including.invoices for
repairs to Plaintiffs home and checks issued by Plaintiff, that it is entitled to $182,448.48 for
repairs-of-property costs and $1,016.95 for initial mitigation and board-up costs, for a total of
$183,465.43. (Id. at 1-2(citing Transatlantic Marine Claims Agencv.Inc. v. Ace Shipping
Corp.. 109F.3d 105, 111 (2dCir. 1997)).)
No party has objected to the R&R and the time in which to do so has passed. Fed. R.
Civ. P. 72(b)(2). The court therefore reviews the R&R for clear error. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72,1983
Advisory Committee's Notes; s^ Colvin v. Berrvhill. 734 F. App'x 756,758 ^(2d Cir. 2018)
(summary order); Wider v. Colvin,245 F. Supp. 3d 381, 385(E.D.N.Y. 2017).
Finding no clear error in the R&R,the court ADOPTS the R&R(Dkt. 16)in full.
Accordingly,Plaintiffs motion for defaultjudgment(Dkt. 15)is GRANTED and the court
awards Plaintiff$183,465.43 in damages. The Clerk of Court is respectfully DIRECTED to
enter judgment for Plaintiffs and close this case.
SO ORDERED.
s/Nicholas Garaufis
Dated: Brooklyn, New York
March-?^ 2019
NICHOLAS G. GARAXTFIS
United States District Juage
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?