Martin v. Designatronics Inc. et al

Filing 46

Minute Order for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge A. Kathleen Tomlinson: Hearing on plaintiff's motion to compel 41 on November 19, 2018. Granting in part and denying in part 41 Motion to Compel. SEE ATTACHED ORDER. Ordered by Judge A. Kathleen Tomlinson on 11/19/18. (Tomlinson, A.)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK BEFORE: A. KATHLEEN TOMLINSON U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE CIVIL CONFERENCE MINUTE ORDER DATE: TIME: 11-19-2018 10:10 a.m. (17 minutes) Martin v. Designatronics Inc., et al. CV 17-4907 (DRH) (AKT) TYPE OF CONFERENCE: MOTION HEARING APPEARANCES: Plaintiff: David Evan Gottlieb Kenneth Daniel Walsh Defendants: Frank W. Brennan FTR: 10:10-10:27 SCHEDULING: Counsel are directed to contact Chambers (631-712-5760) to set up a telephone conference within three days of Judge Hurley’s decision on the motion to dismiss if the motion is denied in whole or in part. THE FOLLOWING RULINGS WERE MADE: 1. Today’s hearing was set to issue a decision on plaintiff’s pending motion to compel and the opposition filed by defendants. See DE 41. The motion is GRANTED in limited part as follows: • Defendants shall produce, by November 29, 2018, pay stubs, W-2 forms and any payroll records for the plaintiff for the period during which he was employed (the Court understands that defendants contest the “employment” relationship); and • Defendants shall produce year-end financial statements only for the years 2013 through 2017. These records shall also be produced by November 29, 2018. The rest of the relief sought by the plaintiff is denied. 2. All of the discovery in this case remains stayed pending the outcome of the pending motion to dismiss. SO ORDERED /s/ A. Kathleen Tomlinson A. KATHLEEN TOMLINSON U.S. Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?