Kitzen v. Hancock et al
Filing
44
ADOPTION ORDER REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - The R&R is adopted in its entirety. The Defendants' motion to dismiss is granted in part and denied in part in accordance with the findings in the R&R. So Ordered by Judge Arthur D. Spatt on 2/13/2019. (Valle, Christine)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
---------------------------------------------------------------X
IRA KITZEN,
Plaintiff,
-against-
ADOPTION ORDER
17-cv-6926 (ADS) (AKT)
PETER HANCOCK, LAND AND SEA
CONSTRUCTION CORP., HCD CONSTRUCTION
MANAGEMENT AND PLANNING CORP., BLUE
GATE CONSULTING CORP., SUSAN
HANCOCK, ELIZABETH HANCOCK, JODI
TARSHIS, and “JOHN and JANE DOEs 1-10,” said
names being Fictitious as such names are unknown at
this time,
Defendants.
-----------------------------------------------------------------X
SPATT, District Judge.
On April 5, 2018 and April 9, 2018, the Defendants filed motions to dismiss the complaint
(ECF Nos. 26, 28). These motions were fully briefed on June 14, 2018.
On October 4, 2018, the Court referred this matter to United States Magistrate Judge A.
Kathleen Tomlinson for a recommendation as to whether the above motions should be granted,
and if so, what relief should be awarded.
On January 29, 2019, Judge Tomlinson issued a Report & Recommendation (“R&R”)
recommending that the Plaintiff’s first, second, third, fourth, fifth, seventh, eighth, ninth, tenth,
eleventh, twelfth, and thirteenth causes of actions be dismissed for lack of subject matter
jurisdiction, and that no sanctions be awarded.
More than fourteen (14) days have elapsed since service of the R&R on the parties, who
have failed to file an objection.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72, this Court has
reviewed the R&R for clear error, and finding none, now concurs in both its reasoning and its
result.
Accordingly, the R&R is adopted in its entirety. The Defendants’ motion to dismiss is
granted in part and denied in part in accordance with the findings in the R&R.
SO ORDERED.
Dated: Central Islip, New York
February 13, 2019
____/s/ Arthur D. Spatt_____
ARTHUR D. SPATT
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?