Meyer, Suozzi, English & Klein, P.C. v. Higbee et al
Filing
15
AFFIDAVIT/AFFIRMATION re 6 Summons Issued, 1 Complaint, Service of Foreign Process on Nicholas "Nick" Youngson by Meyer, Suozzi, English & Klein, P.C. (Schlosser, Kevin)
HM Courts
& Tribunals
Service
ROYAL COURTS OF JUSTICE GROUP
Queen’s Bench Division
Foreign Process Section
Room E16
Royal Courts of Justice
Strand, London
WC2A 2LL
DX 44450 Strand
Kevin Schlosser C/o Meyer Suozzi, English & Klein
990 Stewart Avenue
Suite 300
Garden City
NY 11530
USA
T 020 7947 7772
F 0870 324 0025
E
ForeignProcess.RCJ@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk
Text Phone 18001 020 7947 7772
(Helpline for the deaf and hard of
hearing)
www.hmcourts-service.gov.uk
Our ref: SFP 2018-20179
Your ref: Nicholas "Nick"
Youngson
Date; 27 November 2018
Dear Sir/Madam
Re: Service of Foreign Process on
Nicholas "Nick" Youngson
SFP: 2018-20179
Ref; Nicholas "Nick" Youngson
CERTIFICATE - ATTESTATION
The undersigned authority has the honour to certify, in conformity with article 6 of the Convention
L’autorite soussignee a I’honneur d’attester conformenent a Particle 6 de ladite Convention.
1) that the document has been served the (date) 05 November 2018
que le demande a ete executee
le (date)
-at (place, street, number)
-a (localite, rue, numero)
15 Church Road
Hale Village
LIVERPOOL
L24 4AY
- in one of the following methods authorised by article 5:
-dans une des formes suivantes prevues a Particle 5:
a) in accordance with the provisions of sub-paragraph (a) of the first paragraph of article 5 of the
convention
selon les formes legates (article 5, alinea premier, lettre a)
b) in accordance with the following particular
method selon la forme particuliere suivante
The documents were served by posting
them through the defendant’s letterbox.
This method is good service under rule
6.3 (1) (c) of the Civil Procedure Rules
of England and Wales.
c) by delivery to the addressee, who accepted it voluntarily
par remise simple
The documents referred to in the request have been delivered to:
Les documents mentionnes dans la demande ont ete remis a:
- (identity and description of person)
- (identite et qualite de la personne)
- relationship to the addressee (family, business or other)
- liens de parente de subordination ou autres avec
le desinataire de Pacts
2) that the document has not been served, by reason of the following facts:
que la demande n’a pas ete executee, en raison des fails suivants:
in conformity with the second paragraph of article 12 of the Convention, the applicant is requested to
pay the expenses details in the attached statement.
Conformement a Particle 12, alinea 2 de ladite Convention, le requerant est prie de payer ou de
rembourser les frais dont le detail figure au memoire ci-joint
Annexes
Documents returned
Pieces renvoyees
in appropriate cases, documents
establishing the service:
le cas echeant, les documents
justicatifs de Pexecution:
Done at London
fait a
the 27 November, 2018
le
Signature and/or stamp:
Signature et/ou cachet:
ZURUCKSENDEN TO RETURN
SUMMARY OF THE DOCUMENT TO BE SERVED
ELEMENTS ESSENTIELS DE L'ACTE
Convention on the Service Abroad of Judiciai and Extrajudicial Documents in
Civii or Commerciai Matters, signed at The Hague, the 15th of November 1965 (Articie 5, fourth
paragraph).
Convention relative a la signification et a la notification a I'etranger des actes judiciaires ou
extrajudiciaires en matiere civile ou commerciale, signee a La Haye le 15 novembre 1965
(article 5, alin^a 4).
Name and address of the requesting authority:
Norn et adresse de I'autorite requerante :
Kevin Schlosser (kschlosser@msek.com)
c/o Meyer, Suozzi, English, & Klein
990 Stewart Avenue, Suite 300
Garden City, NY 11530
Particulars of the parties*:
Identite des parties*:
Meyer, Suozzi, English & Klein, P.C.,
V.
Mathew K. Higbee, Esq., Nick Youngson,
RM Media, Ltd., and Higbee & Associates.
If appropriate, identity and address of the person interested in the transmission of the document
S’il y a lieu, identity et adresse de la personne int6ressee a la transmission de I’acte
□ JUDICIAL DOCUMENT*
ACTE JUDICIAIRE**
Nature and purpose of the document:
Nature et objet de I’acte :
Nature and purpose of the proceedings and,
when appropriate, the amount in dispute:
Nature et objet de I'instance, le cas echeant, le montant
du litige :
Date and Place for entering appearance**:
Date et lieu de la comparution**:
These documents are to provide notice to the
defendant of the claims against it and that a response
is required within 21 days from the date of service.
All defendants have established and engaged in
a scheme to defraud users of the defendant's free
images by falsely claiming copyright infringement,
knowing no such claim exists as a matter of law.
Within 21 days from the date of service, the defendant must file its
response with The District Court, Eastern District of New York,
100 Federal Plaza Central Islip, NY 11722, electronically at
http://www.uscourts.gov/courtrecords/electronic-filing-cmecf
Court which has given judgment**:
Juridiction qui a rendu la decision**:
N/A
Date of judgment**:
Date de la decision** :
N/A
Time limits stated in the document**:
Indication des delais figurant dans I’acte** :
** if appropriate / s'il y a lieu
□ EXTRAJUDICIAL DOCUMENT*
ACTE EXTRAJUDICIAIRE**
Nature and purpose of the document:
Nature et objet de I'acte :
Time-limits stated in the document**:
Indication des delais figurant dans I'acte**:
** if appropriate / s’il y a lieu
Permanent Bureau September 2011
The defendant must respoind within 21 days from
the date of service. Otherwise, a default judgment
may be entered against it.
WARNING
AVERTISSEMENT
Identity and address of the addressee
Identite et adresse du destinataire Nicholas "Nick" Youngson
15 Church Road
Liverpool, L24 4A7, England
IMPORTANT
THE ENCLOSED DOCUMENT IS OF A LEGAL NATURE AND MAY AFFECT YOUR RIGHTS AND
OBLIGATIONS. THE 'SUMMARY OF THE DOCUMENT TO BE SERVED’ WILL GIVE YOU SOME
INFORMATION ABOUT ITS NATURE AND PURPOSE. YOU SHOULD HOWEVER READ THE
DOCUMENT ITSELF CAREFULLY. IT MAY BE NECESSARY TO SEEK LEGAL ADVICE.
IF YOUR FINANCIAL RESOURCES ARE INSUFFICIENT YOU SHOULD SEEK INFORMATION ON
THE POSSIBILITY OF OBTAINING LEGAL AID OR ADVICE EITHER IN THE COUNTRY WHERE
YOU LIVE OR IN THE COUNTRY WHERE THE DOCUMENT WAS ISSUED.
ENQUIRIES ABOUT THE AVAILABILITY OF LEGAL AID OR ADVICE IN THE COUNTRY WHERE
THE DOCUMENT WAS ISSUED MAY BE DIRECTED TO:
TRESIMPORTANT
LE DOCUMENT CI-JOINT EST DE NATURE JURIDIQUE ET PEUT AFFECTER VOS DROITS ET OBLIGATIONS.
LES « ELEMENTS ESSENTIELS DE L'ACTE » VOUS DONNENT QUELQUES INFORMATIONS SUR SA NATURE
ET SON OBJET. IL EST TOUTEFOIS INDISPENSABLE DE LIRE ATTENTIVEMENT LE TEXTE MSME DU
DOCUMENT, IL PEUT ETRE NECESSAIRE DE DEMANDER UN AVIS JURIDIQUE.
SI VOS RESSOURCES SONT INSUFFISANTES, RENSEIGNEZ-VOUS SUR LA POSSIBILITY D'OBTENIR
L’ASSISTANCE JUDICIAIRE ET LA CONSULTATION JURIDIQUE, SOIT DANS VOTRE PAYS, SOIT DANS LE
PAYS D'ORIGINE DU DOCUMENT.
LES DEMANDES DE RENSEIGNEMENTS SUR LES POSSIBILITYS D'OBTENIR L'ASSISTANCE JUDICIAIRE OU
LA CONSULTATION JURIDIQUE DANS LE PAYS D’ORIGINE DU DOCUMENT PEUVENT ETRE ADRESSEES A :
Department of Pro Bono Services
New York State Bar Association
One Elk Street
Albany, NY 12207
518-487-5641
It is recommended that the standard terms in the notice be written in English and French and
where appropriate also in the official language, or in one of the official languages of the State in
which the document originated. The blanks could be completed either in the language of the
State to which the document is to be sent, or in English or French.
II est recommande que les mentions imprimees dans cette note soient redigees en langue frangaise et en langue
anglaise et le cas echeant, en outre, dans la langue ou Tune des langues officielles de I'Etat d'origine de I'acte. Les
blancs pourraient etre remplis, soil dans la langue de I'Etat ou le document doit etre adresse, soit en langue
frangaise, soit en langue anglaise.
Permanent Bureau September 2011
CIVIL COVER SHEET
JS 44 (Rev. 12/12)
The JS 44 civil cover sheet and tlie information contained herein neither replace nor supplement the filing and service of pleadings or other papers as required by law, except as
provided by local rules of court. This form, approved by the Judicial Conference of the United States in September 1974, is required for the use of the Clerk of Court fir the
purpose of initiating the civil docket sheet. (SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON next PAGE OF THIS FORM.)
DEFENDANTS
MATHEW K. HIGBEE, Esq.,
NICK YOLENUS^.
I. (a) PLAINTIFF
MEYER, SUOZZI, ENGLISH & KLEIN, P.C.
(b) County of Residence of First Listed Plaintiff
S;^me^:M§UCKSENOEN-TO RETURN
Nassau
And HiGBi E &
(EXCEPTIN as. PLAINTIFF CASES)
- de restituire
County of Residence of First Listed Defendant
(c) Attorneys (Firm Name, Address, and Telephone Number)
Meyer, Suozzi, English & Klein, P.C.
990 Stewart Avenue
Garden City NY 11530
(516)741-6565
NOTE:
Orange County, CA
(IN U.S. PLAINTIFF CASES ONLY)
IN LAND CONDEMNATION CASES, USE THE LOCATION OF
THE TRACT OF LAND INVOLVED.
Attorneys (IfKnown)
II. BASIS OF JURISDICTION (Phee an "X" in One Box Only)
III. CITIZENSHIP OF PRINCIPAL PARTIES (Place an '‘X"inOneBoxforPiainttJD
and One Box for Defendant)
(For Diversity Cases Oniy)
PTF
I I I U.S. Government
Plaintiff
IXI 3 Federal Question
(U.S. Government Not a Party)
Citizen of This State
I I 2 U.S. Govemmetil
Defendant
I
Citizen of Another State
14 Diversity
(Indicate Citizenship ofParties in Item III)
Citizen or Subject of a
Foreign Country
PTF
DEF
□l □1
□2 □2
□3 □3
DEF
Incorporated or Principal Place
of Business In This State
□4 □4
Incorporated and Principal Place
of Business In Another State
□5 □5
□6 □6
Foreign Nation
IV. N ATURE OF SUIT (Place an "X" in One Box Only)
I I
I I
O
n
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
r~l
rn
PERSONAL INJURY
n 310 Airplane
I I 315 Airplane Product
Liability
320 Assault, Libel &
Slander
n 330 Federal Employers'
Liability
I I 340 Marine
I I 345 Marine Product
Liability
350 Motor Vehicle
□ 355 Motor Vehicle
Product Liability
I I 360 Other Personal
Injury
I I 362 Personal Injury Medical Malpractice
PERSONAL INJURY
I I 365 Personal Injury Product Liability
□ 367 Health Care/
Pharmaceutical
Personal Injury
Product Liability
I I 368 Asbestos Persona!
Injm7 Product
Liability
PERSONAL PROPERTY
□ 370 Other Fraud
371 Truth in Lending
I I 380 Other Personal
Property Damage
I 1 385 Property Damage
Product Liability
I
I
I
I
^210 Land Condemnation
~~] 220 Foreclosure
^ 230 Rent Lease & Ejectment
U 240 Torts to Land
^ 245 Tort Product Liability
Z] 290 All Otlier Real Property
□
□
110 Insurance
120 Marine
130 Miller Act
140 Negotiable Instrument
150 Recovery of Overpayment
& Enforcement of Judgment
151 Medicare Act
152 Recovery of Defaulted
Student Loans
(Exclueds Veterans)
153 Recovery of Overpayment
of Veteran's Benefits
160 Stockholders'Suits
190 Other Contract
195 Contract Product Liability
196 Franchise
□ 375 False Claims Act
I I 400 State Reapportionmeiit
r~l 410 /mtilrust
I I 430 Banks and Banking
I I 450 Commerce
15^ 820 Copyriglits
I I 460 Deportation
□ 830 Patent
I I 470 Racketeer Influenced and
n 840 Trademark
Comipt Organizations
I I 480 Consumer Credit
r~] 710 Fair Labor Standards
□ 861HIA(l395ff)
□ 490 Cable/Sat TV
Act
□ 862 Black Lung (923)
I I 850 Securities/Commodities/
I I 720 Labor/Management.
Excliange
□ 863 DIWC/DIWW (405(g))
Relations
I I 890 Other Statutory Actions
□ 864 SSID Title XVI
I I 740 Railway Labor Act
I I 891 Agricultural Acts
□ 865 RSI (405(g))
n 751 Family and Medical
r~l 893 Environmental Matters
Leave Act
I I 895 Freedom of Information
I I 790 Other Labor Litigation
Act
n 791 Employee Retirement
aPitilSOMEBEEEjriTlQNS
I I 896 Arbitration
Income Security Act
Habeas Corpus:
□ 870 Taxes (U.S. Plaintiff
I 440 Other Civil Riglits
899 Administrative Procedure
463 Alien Detainee
or Defendant)
Act/Review or Appeal of
I 441 Voting
Agency Decision
Q 510 Motions to Vacate
□ 871 IRS—Third Party
I 442 Employment
Sentence
26 USC 7609
n 950 Constitutionality of
JMMIGKAnO.N ' ’W.
I 443 Housing/
State Statutes
I I 530 General
Accommodations
I I 462 Naturalization Application
535 Death Penally
I 445 Amer. w/Disabilities 1 i 465 Otlier Immigration
Other:
Employment
Actions
I I 540 Mandamus & Other
446 Amer. w/Disabililies □ 550 Civil Rights
Other
I I 555 Prison Condition
I 448 Education
560 Civil Detainee Conditions of
Confinement
□
□
I
625 Drug Related Seizure
of Property 21 USC 881
□ 690 Other
□ 422 Appeal 28 USC 158
□ 423 Withdrawal
28 USC 157
□
□
□
□
I
V,
□
ORIGIN (Place an. "X" in One Box Only)
I Original
□2
Removed from
State Court
VI. CAUSE OF ACTION
VII. REQUESTED IN
COMPLAINT:
VIII. RELATED CASE(S)
IF ANY
I
I 3
Remanded from
Q 4 Reinstated or
fl 5
Transferred from
Another District D 6 Multidistrict
Cite the U.S. Civil Statute under which you are filing (Do not cite jtirlsdlclloiial staiiiies unless diversily):
17U.S.C. §§ 101 etseq.
Brief description of cause: Declaratory judgment of non-infringement pursuant to Declaratory Judgment Act 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201
and 2202, the Copyright Laws of the United States, 17 U.S.C. §§ 101 et seq. and violation ofN.Y. Gen. Bus. L, § 349.
CHECK YES only if demanded in complaint;
□ CHECK IF THIS IS A CLASS ACTION
DEMAND $
JURY DEMAND:
□ Yes ^ No
UNDER RULE 23, F.R.Cv.P.
(See insiructionti):
JUDGE
DATE
6/6/18
DOCKET NUMBER
SIGNATURE OF ATTORNEY OF RECORD
/s/ Kevin Schlosser
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
RECEIPT »
AMOUNT
APPLYING IFP
JUDGE
MAG. JUDGE
CERTIFICATION OF ARBITRATION ELIGIBILITY
Local Arbitration Rule 83.10 provides that with certain exceptions, actions seeking money damages only in an amountnot in excess of$150,000,
exclusive of interest and costs, are eligible for compulsory arbitration. The amount of damages is presumed to be below the threshold amount unless a
certification to the contrary is filed.
I, Kevin Schlosser
counsel for Plaintiff
ineligible for compulsory arbitration for the following reason(s):
do hereby certify that the above captioned civil action is
I I
monetary damages sought are in excess of $ 1,000,000, exclusive of interest and costs,
I I
the complaint seeks injunctive relief,
1^
the matter is otherwise ineligible for the following reason The action seeks a declaratory judgment.
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT - FEDERAL RULES CIVIL PROCEDURE 7.1
Identify any parent corporation and any publicly held corporation that owns 10% or more or its stocks:
No publicly held corporation owns 10% or more of Plaintiff s stock.
RELATED CASE STATEMENT fSection VIII on the Front of this Form!
Please list all cases that are arguably related pursuant to Division of Business Rule 50.3.1 in Section VIII on the front of this form. Rule 50.3.1 (a)
provides that "A civil case is "related" to another civil case for purposes of this guideline when, because of the similarity of facts and legal issues or
because the cases arise from the same transactions or events, a substantial saving ofjudicial resources is likely to result from assigning both cases to the
samejudge and magistratejudge." Rule 50.3,1 (b) provides that" A civil case shall not be deemed "related" to another civil case merely because the civil
case: (A) involves identical legal issues, or (B) involves the same parties." Rule 50.3.1 (c) further provides that "Presumptively, and subject to the power
of a judge to determine otherwise pursuant to paragraph (d), civil cases shall not be deemed to be "related" unless both cases are still pending before the
court."
NY-E DIVISION OF BUSINESS RULE S0.1(dV2f
1.)
Is the civil action being filed in the Eastern District removed from a New York State Court located in Nassau or Suffolk
County: NO
_____ _
2.)
If you answered "no" above:
a) Did the events or omissions giving rise to the claim or claims, or a substantial part thereof, occur in Nassau or Suffolk
County? YES___________________
b) Did the events or omissions giving rise to the claim or claims, or a substantial part thereof, occur in the Eastern
District? YES
________ _
If your answer to question 2 (b) is "No," does the defendant (or a majority of the defendants, if there is more than one) reside in Nassau or
Suffolk County, or, in an interpleader action, does the claimant (or a majority of the claimants, if there is more than one) reside in Nassau
or Suffolk County? _______________
(Note: A corporation shall be considered a resident of the County in which it has the most significant contacts).
BAR ADMISSION
I am currently admitted in the Eastern District of New York and currently a member in good standing of the bar of this court.
H
Yes
□
No
Are you currently the subject of any disciplinary action (s) in this or any other state or federal court?
[U
Yes
(If yes, please explain)
^
No
I certify the accuracy of all information provided above.
Signature: /s/ Kevin Schlosser
4113283
______
Case 2:18-cv-03353-ADS-ARL Document 6 Filed 06/08/18 Page 1 of 2 PagelD #: 54
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action
United States District Court
for the
Eastern District of New York
MEYER, SUOZZI, ENGLISH & KLEIN, P.C.,
Plaintiff(s)
Civil Action No. 18cv3353(ADS)(ARL)
V.
Mathew K. Higbee, Esq.,
Nick Youngson, RM Media, Ltd., and
Higbee & Associates,
Defendant(s)
SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION
To: (Defendant’s name and address)
Mathew K. Higbee, Esq.
1504 Brookhollow Dr.
Suite 112
Santa Ana, CA 92705
Nick Youngson
15 Church Road
Liverpool L24 4A7
England
RM Media, Ltd.
c/o Higbee & Associates
1504 Brookhollow Dr.
Suite 112
Santa Ana, CA 92705
Higbee & Associates
1504 Brookhollow Dr.
Suite 112
Santa Ana, CA 92705
A lawsuit has been filed against you.
Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you
are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.
P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of
the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiffs attorney,
whose name and address are:
Kevin Schlosser, Esq.
Meyer, Suozzi, English & Klein, P.C.
990 Stewart Avenue, Suite 300
Garden City, NY 11530-9194
If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint.
You also must file your answer or motion with the court.
DOUGLAS C. PALMER
CLERK OF COURT
Date:
06/08/2018
*Deatuia
__________
Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk
Case 2:18"CV--03353-ADS"ARL Document 6 Filed 06/08/18 Page 2 of 2 PageiD #: 55
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)
Civil Action No. 18cv3353(ADS)(ARL)
PROOF OF SERVICE
(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (1))
This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)
was received by me on (date)
□ I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)
; or
on (date)
□ I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)
, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,
on (date)
, and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or
, who is
□ I served the summons on (name of individual)
designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)
; or
on (date)
; or
□ I returned the summons unexecuted because
□ Other (specify):
My fees are $
for travel and $
for services, for a total of $
I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.
Date:
Server’s signature
Printed name and title
Server’s address
Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:
q.OO
Case 2:18"CV~03353-ADS~ARL Document 5-1 Filed 06/08/18 Page 1 of 11 PagelD #: 32
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
MEYER, SUOZZI, ENGLISH & KLEIN, P.C.,
Docket No.:
Plaintiff,
-against-
COMPLAINT
MATHEW K. HIGBEE, Esq.,
NICK YOUNGSON,
RM MEDIA, LTD.,
And HIGBEE & ASSOCIATES,
Defendants.
Plaintiff Meyer, Suozzi, English & Klein, P.C., pro se, complaining of defendants Nicholas
“Nick” Youngson, RM Media, Ltd., Mathew K. Higbee, Esq., and Higbee & Associates
(collectively, the “Defendants”), alleges as follows:
NATURE OF ACTION
1.
Plaintiff brings this action as one of the unsuspecting victims of a fraudulent scheme
in which Defendants abuse the copyright laws by filing copyright registrations over effortless and
mundane photographs, making the photos freely available on the internet for no charge so that
Defendants can thereby catch innocent people unwittingly using the photos without an
“attribution” that is requested on Defendants’ purposefully convoluted website where the photos
are offered under “license,” and then, by using harassing scare tactics to extract money from their
victims to “settle” purported copyright claims with the specter of statutory damages of up to
$150,000 to which Defendants know fully that they are not entitled.
2.
Thus, upon information and belief, Defendants have conspired to orchestrate their
fraudulent scheme through the following deceptive tactics, among others:
Case 2:18-cv~03353-ADS-ARL Document 5-1 Filed 06/08/18 Page 2 of 11 PageiD #: 33
a. An individual who reportedly lives in England takes photographs of common text
printing.
b. A copyright registration is filed with the United States Copyright Office for the subject
photos.
c. The photos are then made available on the internet, and easily found through the use of
common search terms of the text in the photos, for anyone to copy the photos and use
such in whatever manner and for whatever purpose they wish, including for commercial
use.
d. On the website page where the photo is found, no charge or any fee is requested for use
of the photo as it appears, as Defendants know that no one would actually pay any
meaningful money for such mundane photos, yet Defendants have used this scheme to
extract thousands of dollars from unsuspecting victims as further described herein.
e. The website from which the photos can be easily copied has a convoluted configuration
by which the user would be forced to “click” through a series of different pages and
websites to try to decipher who is really entitled to the so-called copyright, under what
terms the photos can be used, what the “license” agreement is, who the actual licensor
is, what the attribution requested is and what connection the attribution has to the
copyright owner, if any, none of which is clearly set forth or even decipherable on
careful study.
f. The deceptive website indicates the license is automatically given to the user, but then
requires the user to “click” through a series of hyperlinks that lead to a third-party
website where there is a different form of “license.”
Case 2:18--cv~03353-ADS-ARL Document 5-1 Filed 06/08/18 Page 3 of 11 PagelD #: 34
g. Although on the original website where the photo is located, the photo is offered free
under license, there is also a free “shared” form of license agreement on an entirely
different page and website (published by an independent company having nothing to
do with these photos or the copyrights) that does not even contain the names of the
parties to that form of license or any place in which either party can sign or agree to the
terms.
h. In their pursuit of catching innocent victims. Defendants then troll the internet by using
precise search criteria tied to the photos so that they can easily monitor who has copied
the photos on the internet.
i.
Once Defendants identify someone who has used the photo(s) and unwittingly failed
to include the “attribution” that is requested on the convoluted website. Defendants
launch their extortionate tactics to harass, intimidate and scare the user into paying
thousands of dollars.
j. Although, in the website maze in which the photos appear, a party called “Blue
Diamond Gallery” is purportedly making the photos available, Defendants do not
purport to assert claims on behalf of “Blue Diamond Gallery” or the individual who
filed the actual copyright registration, or the entity for which an attribution is requested.
(On the website where the photo appears, there is no explanation of who or what “Blue
Diamond Gallery” is or what connection it has to the photos or any copyrights.)
k. As part of their extortionate tactics, Defendants send threatening letters through use of
a California lawyer and law firm to the unsuspecting victims demanding thousands of
dollars to “settle,” claiming that the use of the photo constitutes copyright infringement
and thereby exposes the user to statutory damages of up to $150,000.
Case 2:18"CV~03353~ADS-ARL Document 5-1 Filed 06/08/18 Page 4 of 11 PageiD #: 35
l. Defendants’ demand letter does not provide any factual basis under which damages of
up to $150,000 would ever be awarded.
m. In fact, contrary to the assertions in the demand letter, there is no copyright
infringement under the circumstances because the photos are freely made available to
the user under a “license,” which thereby precludes a claim for copyright infringement
and simply renders the use subject to a mere alleged claim of breach of the “license,”
for which no such “statutory damages” are available and for which no actual damages
can be proved, certainly not the thousands of dollars deceptively demanded by
Defendants.
n. Defendants then continue their harassing conduct by repeatedly attempting to extract
some form of “settlement” money from their victims, including threatening suit, or in
some instances, bringing suit and then quickly settling and/or dismissing such suits.
3.
As a result of the foregoing. Plaintiff brings this action for a declaratory judgment,
pursuant to the Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201 and 2202, determining and declaring
that (a) Defendants have no legitimate claim for copyright infringement because Plaintiff did not
infringe as a matter of law, and (b) Defendants have no cognizable or recoverable damages for
breach of contract or otherwise.
4.
Plaintiff also seeks relief, including damages, for Defendants’ false, fraudulent and
deceptive practices, which violate N.Y. Gen. Bus. L. § 349.
PARTIES AND JURISDICTION
5.
Plaintiff is a professional corporation duly organized and authorized to do business
in the State of New York, with a place of business at 990 Stewart Avenue, Suite 300, Garden City,
New York 11530.
Case 2:18-cv-03353"ADS-ARL Document 5-1 Filed 06/08/18 Page 5 of 11 PagelD #: 36
6.
Upon information and belief, Defendant Nick Youngson is a natural person who
resides in the United Kingdom and who claims to be photographer by trade.
7.
Upon information and belief, Defendant RM Media, Ltd. is a foreign business
entity that operates out of the United Kingdom.
8.
Upon information and belief. Defendant Mathew K. Higbee is a natural person, and
an attorney licensed under the laws of the State of California.
9.
Upon information and belief, Defendant Higbee & Associates (the “Firm”) is a law
firm with a principal place of business in and formed under the laws of the State of California.
10.
Upon information and belief, the Firm is the agent for and conducts business
through and on behalf of Defendant RM Media, Ltd., including in and throughout the United
States, including the State of New York.
11.
An actual, antagonistic and justiciable controversy now exists between Plaintiff and
Defendants with respect to which Plaintiff is entitled to have a declaration of its rights and
protections, as well as relief, from Defendants’ unlawful conduct.
12.
This Court has original jurisdiction pursuant to Title 28 of the United States Code,
Section 1338(a) (federal question) because this action arises under the Copyright laws of the
United States (17 U.S.C. §§ 101 et seq.), and pursuant to the Declaratory Judgment Act (28 U.S.C.
§§ 2201 and 2202).
13.
This Court has personal jurisdiction over Defendants because they are doing
business, and/or transacting business within and directed to New York, and Plaintiffs claims
herein arise from those activities.
14.
At all relevant times hereto. Defendants’ acts and practices occurred in and
throughout the United States, including in the State of New York.
Case 2:18"CV~03353-ADS~ARL Document 5-1 Filed 06/08/18 Page 6 of 11 PagelD #: 37
15.
Defendants’ wrongful acts and practices, including those upon which the claims
herein are based, have crossed into and taken place in the State of New York.
16.
At all times relevant herein, upon information and belief. Defendants have acted in
concert with each other, with the knowledge and participation of each other, to commit the
wrongful acts alleged herein.
17.
Venue in this judicial district is proper pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2) because
a substantial part of the alleged events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred, or a
substantial part of property that is the subject of the action, is situated in this Judicial District.
FACTS
18.
On or about December 26, 2017, Plaintiff published, on one of its blogs, an article
(the “Article”).
19.
To accompany the Article, Plaintiffs marketing personnel used a generic stock
photograph (the “Image”) from a website offering “[t]he burden-of-prooffree pictures for your
web site.” (Emphasis added.).
20.
The Image was “offered” by the Blue Diamond Gallery and hosted on the following
website page: http://thebluediamondgallery.eom/b/burden-of-proof.html (the “Blue Diamond
Website”).
21.
Copies of the Blue Diamond Website and other related web pages, where the Image
was “offered,” are annexed hereto as Exhibit 1.
22.
On February 5, 2018, Plaintiff received a letter from Defendants, dated January 30,
2018 (“Demand I”).
23.
Immediately upon receiving Demand 1, Plaintiff removed the Image from its
website and discontinued such use.
Case 2:18"CV"03353-ADS”ARL Document 5-1 Filed 06/08/18 Page 7 of 11 PagelD #: 38
24.
Plaintiff has received no monetary benefit from the Image.
25.
Any failure by Plaintiff to provide any attribution with the Image was inadvertent,
innocent and unintentional.
26.
Any failure to provide any attribution with the Image has not resulted in any
monetary or other known damage to any of the Defendants.
27.
In Demand I, Defendants Higbee and the Firm claimed to represent Defendant RM
Media concerning the Image.
28.
The Image is a copyrighted work registered to Defendant Youngson.
29.
In Demand I, Defendants falsely contended that Plaintiff had infringed Defendant
RM Media’s alleged copyright in the Image and that “[i]f forced to go to court, [Defendants] will
ask for the maximum relief possible, which may include statutory damages under 17 U.S.C. T| [sic]
504 for up to $150,000 for intentional infringement or $30,000 for unintentional infringement.”
30.
In Demand I, Defendants referenced an already-established online collection
account associated with Plaintiff to which payments were to be immediately made.
31.
In making these allegations against Plaintiff, Defendants did not set forth a good
faith basis to believe that Plaintiffs use of the Image constituted copyright infringement.
32.
In fact, Defendants sent Demand I to Plaintiff knowing that there was no claim of
copyright infringement as a matter of law because the Image was offered under license for free
including for commercial purposes.
33.
In Demand I, Defendants attempted to extract a “settlement” of $5,280 from
Plaintiff without ever explaining how Defendants arrived upon that amount, what the basis for
such amount could be, or any other explanation.
Case 2:18"CV"03353"ADS-ARL Document 5-1 Filed 06/08/18 Page 8 of 11 PageiD #: 39
34.
Upon information and belief, Defendants sent Demand I to Plaintiff as a means of
harassing and intimidating Plaintiff into thinking that it was exposed to such significant damages,
even though Defendants knew full well that there was no legal basis for their claim.
35.
Though Demand I provides that Plaintiff had thirty (30) days to respond, in
furtherance of their intimidation tactics. Defendants sent multiple communications to Plaintiff
within that time that were harassing and threatening.
36.
On February 13, 2018, Plaintiff responded to Defendants, informing them of the
inherent flaws in their claim, the innocent and de minimus nature of the use of the Image, that
Plaintiff had discontinued use of the Image and considered the matter closed, and requested that
Defendants likewise consider the matter closed.
37.
Defendants thereafter sent additional emails and repeatedly called Plaintiff to
extract money from Plaintiff, by falsely claiming copyright infringement and demanding
thousands of dollars.
38.
Defendants then sent an escalated communication dated May 9, 2018, which
Plaintiff received on May 22, 2018, which included a purported draft of a civil complaint
(“Demand 11”).
39.
In Demand II, Defendants falsely claimed again that Plaintiff “engaged in copyright
infringement when it posted [the] client’s copyrighted image on its website without a valid
licensing agreement.”
40.
However, Defendants were fully aware that the Image was made available by
license (albeit in the convoluted and confusing websites that Defendants used to trap unsuspecting
victims of its fraudulent and deceptive scheme).
Case 2:18-cv-03353-ADS-ARL Document 5~1 Filed 06/08/18 Page 9 of 11 PageiD #: 40
41.
In Demand II, Defendants again claimed that they are “entitled to recover Statutory
damages of up to $150,000 for each infringement and may also recover attorney fees and court
costs. See 17 U.S.C. §§ 504 & 505.”
42.
Demand II stated that the “offer will be open for fifteen (15) days from the date of
[the] letter, after which our client has instructed us to file the enclosed Complaint and seek damages
to the full extent of the law.”
43.
Upon information and belief, Defendants falsely and strategically claimed
entitlement to the maximum statutory damages, emphasized the discretionary fees and cost, and
marked Demand II with a period of urgency, to further pressure, intimidate, and frighten Plaintiff
into immediately paying the requested settlement amount.
44.
Defendants’ assertions of copyright infringement are false and deceptive for
various reasons, including, but not limited to, the fact that the Image was “offered” expressly under
license, and thus, Plaintiff had a license and did not infringe the copyright as a matter of law.
45.
Defendants are also guilty of fraudulent business practices in violation of N.Y. Gen.
Bus. L. § 349, for various reasons, including, but not limited to numerous wrongful and deceptive
acts as further set forth herein, including as alleged above and as follows:
a. promoting the Image as “free,” with no restriction on access and no requirement to agree
to terms before use, with the intent that it be so used;
b. trolling the Internet for users of the Image with intent to trap innocent and unsuspecting
victims, whom Defendants could then intimidate into unjustifiably paying thousands of
dollars;
Case 2:18-cv--03353-ADS"ARL Document 5-1 Filed 06/08/18 Page 10 of 11 PagelD #: 41
c. sending demand letters falsely claiming that Plaintiff does not have a license to use the
Image and that Plaintiff infringed the Image copyright, while knowing fully that there is
no infringement as a matter of law because the Image was “offered” under a license; and
d. sending the aforementioned demand letters with the intent and purpose to threaten and
intimidate Plaintiff into paying money that the Defendants are not entitled to, while
knowing fully that there was no good faith basis to believe any claim existed.
FIRST CLAIM FOR RELIEF
(For Declaratory Judgment of Non-Infringement)
46.
Plaintiff repeats and re-alleges each of the allegations of this complaint as though
fully set forth herein.
47.
There is a substantial controversy between Plaintiff and Defendants, and they have
adverse legal interests of sufficient immediacy and reality to warrant the issuance of a declaratory
judgment.
48.
By reason of Defendants’ wrongful allegations of infringement and other
wrongdoing committed by Defendants as alleged herein, a declaratory judgment is necessary to
resolve, clarify and settle the respective rights and legal positions of the parties.
49.
As such, the Court should issue a declaratory judgment that (a) Plaintiffs use of
the Image under license does not constitute copyright infringement as a matter of law, and (b)
Defendants cannot sustain any claim for breach of contract (any license) because there are no
resulting damages.
SECOND CLAIM FOR RELIEF
(For Defendants’ violation of N.Y. Gen. Bus. L. § 349)
50.
Plaintiff repeats and re-alleges each of the allegations of this eomplaint as though
fully set forth herein.
10
Case 2:18-cv--03353~ADS~ARL Document 5-1 Filed 06/08/18 Page 11 of 11 Page!D #: 42
51.
By reason of the Defendants’ deceptive practices of attempting to extort money
from Plaintiff under false claims of copyright infringement and as more fully described in this
complaint, the Defendants have violated N.Y. Gen. Bus. L. § 349 and thus, Plaintiff is entitled to
damages from Defendants, jointly and severally, in an amount established at trial.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Meyer, Suozzi, English & Klein, P.C., respectfully requests
judgment as follows;
1)
Issuing a declaratory judgment that (a) Plaintiffs use of the Image under license
does not constitute eopyright infringement as a matter of law, and (b) Defendants cannot sustain
any claim for breach of contract (the license) because there are no resulting damages.
2)
Awarding Plaintiff damages against Defendants, jointly and severally, including
Plaintiffs full costs of this litigation, including reasonable attorneys’ fees as provided for in 17
U.S.C. § 505 and N.Y. Gen. Bus. L. § 349(h); and
3)
Awarding Plaintiff such other relief as this Court may deem just and proper.
Dated: Garden City, New York
June 6, 2018
MEYER, SUOZZI, ENGLISH & KLEIN, P.C.
Pro Se
By:
/s/________________
Kevin Schlosser
990 Stewart Avenue, Suite 300
Garden City, New York 11530-9194
Tel.: (516)741-6565
kschlosser@msek.com
11
4112009
Case 2:18”CV~03353"ADS-ARL Document 5--2 Filed 06/08/18 Page 1 of 11 PageiD #; 43
EXHIBIT 1
5/28/2018 Case 2:18-cv-03353-ADS-ARL Document 5-2But{iq(i@tP@6/08/18 Page 2 of 11 PagelD #: 44
Important - Please Read
Close
The images on this site offered under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license maybe used for free including
for commercial purposes subject to the terms of the license. Should you not be familiar with Creative Commons licenses including
their attribution requirements then please read the license here
The Blue Diamond Gallery
The burden-of-prooffree pictures for your web site
Advert
High Quality Images
all at Low Low Prices
NYPhotograph
The image below related to the word burden-of-proof is licensed by it's creator under a Creative Commons AttributionShareAlike license which permits the free use of the image for any purpose including commercial use and also permits
the image to be modified, attribution required, see license details below and FAQ.
Please ensure the license and image size are suitable for your use, altematiwiy you can purchase the original foil size
image on a rights managed license for a few dollars from AlphaStocklmages.com here
http://thebluediamondgallery.eom/b/burden-of-proof.html
1/4
5/28/2018 Case 2:18-cv-03353-ADS-ARL Document b-2Bu^5gOTTRemt6t>^onHS|h^ii^©8^^-Pa|§>^/t)|.qLi PagelD #: 48
Creative Commons License Deed
Attribution-ShareAlikeS.O Unported (CC BY-SA3.0)
This is a human-readable summary of (and not a substitute for) the license.
You are free to:
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material
for any purpose, even commercially.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
Attribution —You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if
changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that
suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
ShareAlike— If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your
contributions under the same license as the original.
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that
legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public
domain or where your use is permitted byan applicable exception or limitation.
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for
your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may
limit howyou use the material.
https ://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
1/1
5/28/2018 Case 2:18-cv-03353-ADS-ARL
Page 7 of 11 PagelD #: 49
Creative Commons Legal Code
Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported
CREATIVE COMMONS CORPORATION IS NOT A LAW FIRM AND DOES NOT PROVIDE LEGAL
SERVICES. DISTRIBUTION OF THIS LICENSE DOES NOT CREATE AN ATTORNEY-CLIENT
RELATIONSHIP. CREATIVE COMMONS PROVIDES THIS INFORMATION ON AN "AS-IS" BASIS.
CREATIVE COMMONS MAKES NO WARRANTIES REGARDING THE INFORMATION PROVIDED,
AND DISCLAIMS LIABILITY FOR DAMAGES RESULTING FROM ITS USE.
License
THE WORK (AS DEFINED BELOW) IS PROVIDED UNDER THE TERMS OF THIS CREATIVE COMMONS
PUBLIC LICENSE ("CCPL" OR "LICENSE"). THE WORK IS PROTECTED BY COPYRIGHT AND/OR
OTHER APPLICABLE LAW. ANY USE OF THE WORK OTHER THAN AS AUTHORIZED UNDER THIS
LICENSE OR COPYRIGHT LAW IS PROHIBITED.
BY EXERCISING ANY RIGHTS TO THE WORK PROVIDED HERE. YOU ACCEPT AND AGREE TO BE
BOUND BY THE TERMS OF THIS LICENSE. TO THE EXTENT THIS LICENSE MAY BE CONSIDERED TO
BE A CONTTTACT, THE LICENSOR GRANTS YOU THE RIGHTS CONTAINED HERE IN CONSIDERATION
OF YOUR ACCEPTANCE OF SUCH TERMS AND CONDITIONS.
1. Definitions
a. "Adaptation" means a work based upon the Work, or upon the Work and other pre-existing works,
such as a translation, adaptation, deri\«iti\« work, arrangement of music or other alterations of a
literary or artistic work, or phonogram or performance and includes cinematographic adaptations or
any other form in which the Work may be recast, transformed, or adapted including in any form
recognizably derived from the original, except that a work that constitutes a Collection will not be
considered an Adaptation for the purpose of this License. For the avoidance of doubt, where the Work
is a musical work, performance or phonogram, the synchronization of the Work in timed-relation with
a moving image ("synching") will be considered an Adaptation for the purpose of this License.
b. "Collection" means a collection of literary or artistic works, such as encyclopedias and anthologies,
or performances, phonograms or broadcasts, or other works or subject matter other than works listed
in Section 1(f) below, which, by reason of the selection and arrangement of their contents, constitute
intellectual creations, in which the Work is included in its entirety in unmodified form along with one
or more other contributions, each constituting separate and independent works in themselves, which
together are assembled into a collective whole. A work that constitutes a Collection will not be
considered an Adaptation (as defined below) for the purposes of this License.
c. "Creative Commons Compatible License" means a license that is listed at
https;//creativecommons.org/compatiblelicenses that has been approied by Creative Commons as
being essentially equivalent to this License, including, at a minimum, because that license: (i)
contains terms that have the same purpose, meaning and effect as the License Elements of this
License: and, (ii) explicitly permits the relicensing of adaptations of works made available under that
license under this License or a Creati\« Commons jurisdiction license with the same License
Elements as this License.
d. "Distribute" means to make available to the public the original and copies of the Work or Adaptation,
as appropriate, through sale or other transfer of ownership.
e. "License Elements" means the following high-level license attributes as selected by Licensor and
indicated in the title of this License: Attribution, ShareAlike.
f. "Licensor" means the individual, individuals, entity or entities that offer(s) the Work under the terms
of this License.
https ://creati \«commons .org /I icenses/by-sa/3.0/leg al code
1/5
5/28/2018 Case 2:18"CV”03353"ADS-ARL Documerttr#«^c:-^ '■
^
r"
Return Address;
Foreign Process Section
Room E16
Royal Courts of Justice
Strand
London WC2A 2LL
o
Li..
t
o*
.X.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?