Hurd v. American Multi-Cinema, Inc.

Filing 18

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 17 Sua Sponte - Report and Recommendations. This action is dismissed for lack of prosecution. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment accordingly and close the case. Ordered by Judge Allyne R. Ross on 7/8/2024. (MK)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK RICHARD HURD, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, — against — 22-CV-3451 (ARR) (AYS) Opinion & Order Not for electronic or print publication AMERICAN MULTI-CINEMA., INC., Defendant. ROSS, United States District Judge: This Court has received the Report and Recommendation on the instant case dated April 3, 2024, from the Honorable Anne Y. Shields, United States Magistrate Judge. No objections have been filed. The Court reviews “de novo any part of the magistrate judge’s disposition that has been properly objected to.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); see also Brissett v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating Auth., No. 09-CV-874 (CBA)(LB), 2011 WL 1930682, at *1 (E.D.N.Y. May 19, 2011), aff’d, 472 F. App’x 73 (2d Cir. 2012) (summary order). Where no timely objections have been filed, “the district court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record.” Finley v. Trans Union, Experian, Equifax, No. 17-CV-0371 (LDH)(LB), 2017 WL 4838764, at *1 (E.D.N.Y. Oct. 24, 2017) (quoting Estate of Ellington ex rel. Ellington v. Harbrew Imports Ltd., 812 F. Supp. 2d 186, 189 (E.D.N.Y. 2011)). Having reviewed the record, I find no clear error. I therefore adopt the Report and Recommendation, in its entirety, as the opinion of the Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Accordingly, this action is dismissed for lack of prosecution, with prejudice, pursuant to Federal Civil Rule of Procedure 41(b). SO ORDERED. _______/s/________________ Allyne R. Ross United States District Judge Dated: July 8, 2024 Brooklyn, New York 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?