Henry, et al v. Champlain Enterprise, et al
Filing
253
ORDER: that the judgment entered on 1/5/2007 is VACATED; the parties may file and serve supplemental memorandums of law on or before 7/31/2009; and Answering memorandums of law may be filed and served on or before 8/14/2009. There will be no further oral argument. Signed by Judge David N. Hurd on 7/15/2009. (see)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ JOSEPH HENRY and MICHAEL MALINKY, Plaintiffs, vs CHAMPLAIN ENTERPRISES, INC., d/b/a CommutAir; ANDREW PRICE; and U.S. TRUST COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA, N.A., Defendants. ----------------- -----------------APPEARANCES: SHAYNE & GREENWALD CO., L.P.A. Attorneys for Plaintiffs 221 South High Street Columbus, Ohio 43215 DeGRAFF, FOY, KUNZ & DEVINE, LLP Attorneys for Plaintiffs 90 State Street Albany, New York 12207 BOND, SCHOENECK & KING, PLLC Attorneys for Champlain Enterprises, Inc.; and Individual Defendants. One Lincoln Center Syracuse, New York 13202 GROOM LAW GROUP CHARTERED Attorneys for Defendant U.S. Trust Company of California, N.A. 1701 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. W ashington, D.C. 20006 DAVID N. HURD United States District Judge OF COUNSEL: GARY D. GREENWALD, ESQ. ANNE MARIE LA BUE, ESQ. 1:01-CV-1681
TERENCE J. DEVINE, ESQ.
EDW ARD R. CONAN, ESQ.
EDW ARD A. SCALLET, ESQ. ROBERT P. GALLAGHER, ESQ. LARS C. GOLUMBIC, ESQ.
ORDER The Mandate from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit was filed in the Northern District of New York on July 14, 2009. (Docket No. 251). In accordance with the Mandate, it is ORDERED that 1. The judgment entered on January 5, 2007 (Docket No. 229) is VACATED; 2. The parties may file and serve supplemental memorandums of law on or before July 31, 2009; and 3. Answering memorandums of law may be filed and served on or before August 14, 2009. There will be no further oral argument. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: July 15, 2009 Utica, New York.
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?