Francis v. Excelsior College

Filing 61

ORDER - That the Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 60) is ADOPTED its entirety. That plaintiff's letter motion seeking to reopen this case (Dkt. No. 48) is DENIED. Signed by Senior Judge Gary L. Sharpe on 6/1/2017. (Copy served via regular mail)(jel, )

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ________________________________ NELLIE S. FRANCIS, Plaintiff, 1:04-cv-656 (GLS/CFH) v. EXCELSIOR COLLEGE, Defendant. ________________________________ APPEARANCES: OF COUNSEL: FOR THE PLAINTIFF: NELLIE S. FRANCIS 16 Miller Avenue Providence, Rhode Island 02905 FOR THE DEFENDANT: Whiteman, Osterman Law Firm 99 Washington Avenue Albany, New York 12260 HEATHER D. DIDDEL, ESQ. Gary L. Sharpe Senior District Judge ORDER The above-captioned matter comes to this court following a ReportRecommendation and Order by Magistrate Judge Christian F. Hummel, duly filed on May 8, 2017. (Dkt. No. 60.) Following fourteen days from the service thereof, the Clerk has sent the file, including any and all objections filed by the parties herein. No objections having been filed, and the court having reviewed the Report-Recommendation for clear error, it is hereby ORDERED that the Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 60) is ADOPTED in its entirety; and it is further ORDERED that plaintiff’s letter motion seeking to reopen this case (Dkt. No. 48) is DENIED; and it is further ORDERED that the clerk provide a copy of this Order to the parties in accordance with the court’s Local Rules of Practice. IT IS SO ORDERED. June 1, 2017 Albany, New York 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?