Lennon v. Commissioner of Social Security
DECISION and ORDERED, that the Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 24) is APPROVED and ADOPTED in its ENTIRETY; and it is further ORDERED that the Commissioners decision denying disability benefits is REMANDED for further proceedings in accordance with Judge Bianchinis Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 24) and pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. Section 405(g). Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on May 13, 2010. (sas)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK MARLA LENNON, Plaintiff, -againstMICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. 1:08-CV-1123 (LEK/VEB)
DECISION AND ORDER This matter comes before the Court following a Report-Recommendation filed on April 23, 2010, by the Honorable Victor E. Bianchini, United States Magistrate Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and L.R. 72.3(c) of the Northern District of New York. Report-Rec. (Dkt. No. 24). Within fourteen days after a party has been served with a copy of a Magistrate Judge's Report-Recommendation, the party "may serve and file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations," FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b), in compliance with L.R. 72.1. No objections have been raised in the allotted time with respect to Judge Bianchini's Report-Recommendation. Furthermore, after examining the record, the Court has determined that the Report-Recommendation is not subject to attack for plain error or manifest injustice. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED, that the Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 24) is APPROVED and ADOPTED in its ENTIRETY; and it is further ORDERED that the Commissioner's decision denying disability benefits is REMANDED
for further proceedings in accordance with Judge Bianchini's Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 24) and pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. Section 405(g); and it is further ORDERED, that the Clerk serve a copy of this Order on all parties. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: May 13, 2010 Albany, New York
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?